Libby Loft and Luis Manriquez oppose I-638's medical-verification requirement

Libby LoftFamily physician and co-author of the signed opinion

Loft and Manriquez argue that I-638 would require invasive or expensive verification and discourage girls' participation. They urge a no vote.

“a medically unnecessary invasive genital exam or costly genetic testing”

Analysis

Open source (opens in a new tab)Libby Loft and Luis Manriquez oppose I-638's verification requirementOpening paragraphs and discussion of medical examinations

Where this statement fits

I-638 supporters defend sex verification for girls' sports; physicians warn of invasive testing

Washington's IL26-638 would require a health-care provider to verify sex for girls' sports participation. Supporter Hallie Herzberg describes a checkbox on a routine physical form. Physicians Libby Loft and Luis Manriquez argue that the text would require invasive or costly testing.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Analysis

Libby Loft and Luis Manriquez oppose I-638's verification requirement (opens in a new tab)Opening paragraphs and discussion of medical examinations

About this source

Two family physicians argue that the initiative would require invasive or costly verification. This is their signed opinion.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

The physicians criticize the initiative's premise and explain why genital exams are not routine sports-physical care.

After the quotation

They argue that alternative genetic and hormone tests also raise cost and clinical concerns.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference is the initiative's verification requirement. The physicians expressly reject it as medically unnecessary and harmful.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Libby Loft, Libby Loft and Luis Manriquez oppose I-638's medical-verification requirementDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Libby Loft and Luis Manriquez oppose I-638's medical-verification requirement
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/6875-loft-and-manriquez-argue-that-i-638-would

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Libby Loft and Luis Manriquez oppose I-638's medical-verification requirement". First published: 2026-10-26. Last updated: 2026-10-26. https://disputeindex.com/events/6875-loft-and-manriquez-argue-that-i-638-would