Damjanovic says the alliance matters more than the label
Ivana DamjanovicAssociate professor of law at the University of Canberra
Damjanovic argues that the proposal is better understood as an economic-security alliance. She describes ratification and regulatory obstacles to more extensive integration.
“The label is noise but the substance is an economic security alliance that Australia should watch closely.”
Analysis
Where this statement fits
Should Canada become an associate member of the European Union?
In her State of the European Union address on 16 September 2026, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said she would like to work with Prime Minister Mark Carney on opening the door for Canada to be the first associate member of the European Union, as part of moving beyond the existing CETA trade agreement to what she called an Alliance for the Future. Carney, present as an invited guest, told the European Parliament the following day that Canada welcomes the ambition, while attributing the associate-member phrase to von der Leyen rather than adopting it, and promised debates and a vote in the Canadian Parliament on the final structure. Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre set red lines against Canadians paying taxes to Brussels, following European laws they did not vote on, or adopting European immigration policy. United States President Donald Trump said that if he judged the arrangement a hostile act he would impose heavy tariffs on Europe or curtail trade. No agreement has been signed, and associate membership is not a status defined in the European Union's treaties.
Source and context
Analysis
About this source
Damjanovic argues that the practical economic-security partnership matters more than the associate-member label.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
The article distinguishes the phrase associate membership from the treaty arrangements available to the EU.
After the quotation
She argues that Australia should watch how Canada and the EU develop practical cooperation.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
Relative to the proposed Canada-EU relationship, Damjanovic challenges the membership framing and focuses on the alliance's substance.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseCarleton's Achim Hurrelmann doubts an associate-member status for Canada can be set up soon
“I'm not sure if a status with that name can be established for Canada any time soon”Read statement
Poilievre says the summit cut no tariffs and warns against aligning Canada with European policies
“Worse, there was lots of talk at the summit about aligning Canada with the insane European taxes, debt, immigration and anti-oil and gas policies that have left parts of Europe bankrupt and burning.”Read statement
German ambassador says the two sides should give the associate-member label real content
“The president of the commission and the prime minister are using the term associated membership, so let's fill that name with life and see what it can be about. I think we should not be distracted by the label in question from the important content that has been agreed today”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Damjanovic says the alliance matters more than the label
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/6764-damjanovic-argues-that-the-proposal-is-better-understood
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Damjanovic says the alliance matters more than the label". First published: 2026-10-25. Last updated: 2026-10-25. https://disputeindex.com/events/6764-damjanovic-argues-that-the-proposal-is-better-understood