Nation columnist argues impeachment is the fitting remedy for Hegseth

Washington bureau chief of The Nation, writing analysis

It’s hard to think of a case where impeachment would be a more appropriate remedy. After all, if murder doesn’t qualify as a “high crime and misdemeanor,” what does? And an impeachment inquiry, closely targeted on documenting criminal charges, would be an encouraging first step in holding Hegseth accountable for his conduct in an actually meaningful way.
Open source (opens in a new tab)The Push to Impeach Pete Hegseth Is OnParagraph beginning “It’s hard to think of a case where impeachment would be a more appropriate remedy.”

Source and context

Analysis

The Push to Impeach Pete Hegseth Is On (opens in a new tab)Paragraph beginning “It’s hard to think of a case where impeachment would be a more appropriate remedy.”

About this source

Signed analysis column by The Nation’s Washington bureau chief, published the day Rep. Thanedar introduced H.Res. 935. It states the author’s own view, not an institutional position of the magazine.

Before the quotation

The column notes that Democratic lawmakers had largely balked at a motion to impeach Hegseth.

After the quotation

He goes on to fault House Democratic leadership for treating impeachment as politically risky.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

Case context: Should Pete Hegseth be impeached?

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

Relative to whether the House should impeach Hegseth, Lehmann endorses impeachment as the appropriate course in his own voice. The column states his position, not an institutional position of the magazine.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Pete Hegseth
Pete Hegseth
Credit: Gage Skidmore

Should Pete Hegseth be impeached?

Explore the case context, sources and public responses.

Read the full case

More from this case

Read the full case

Free Speech For People

In supporting Trump’s constitutional violations and actively participating in, or even initiating, the actions noted above, Hegseth has failed to faithfully discharge the duties of his office. Further, Hegseth participated in multiple unauthorized, unsecured communications on Signal with individuals who are not government employees, jeopardizing national security and demonstrating a dangerous lack of judgment. He must be held accountable for his actions.
Read statement

MoveOn

Hegseth has shown he cannot be trusted with the power of this office and this position. Impeachment and aggressive oversight are necessary steps to stop further abuses.
Read statement

Win Without War

Hegseth is making people less safe — and it’s time for him to go.
Read statement