Mark Kelly says removing Hegseth makes sense

U.S. senator for Arizona; named in Article VI of the Massie resolution

I could probably cite 50 times the guy should have been fired.” … “Yeah, I agree that it makes sense to remove him from this position.
Open source (opens in a new tab)Thomas Massie moves to impeach Pete HegsethFinal section, paragraph beginning “When asked if he thinks Hegseth should be impeached…”

Source and context

Reporting

Thomas Massie moves to impeach Pete Hegseth (opens in a new tab)Final section, paragraph beginning “When asked if he thinks Hegseth should be impeached…”

About this source

The Washington Examiner reports Sen. Mark Kelly’s answer when asked whether Hegseth should be impeached. Kelly is named in Article VI of Massie’s resolution. No second outlet carrying this specific exchange was located.

Before the quotation

The Washington Examiner reports that Kelly was asked whether he thinks Hegseth should be impeached, and said Hegseth should have “never” had the job.

After the quotation

The two sentences are printed as separate quotations divided by the attribution “Kelly said.” Kelly is named in Article VI of Massie’s resolution, which alleges retaliation against him; that allegation is unadjudicated.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

Case context: Should Pete Hegseth be impeached?

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

Relative to whether the House should impeach Hegseth, Kelly answers an express impeachment question by agreeing that removal makes sense. The Senate tries an impeachment rather than voting articles, and Kelly does not address the House resolution itself.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Pete Hegseth
Pete Hegseth
Credit: Gage Skidmore

Should Pete Hegseth be impeached?

Explore the case context, sources and public responses.

Read the full case

More from this case

Read the full case

Free Speech For People

In supporting Trump’s constitutional violations and actively participating in, or even initiating, the actions noted above, Hegseth has failed to faithfully discharge the duties of his office. Further, Hegseth participated in multiple unauthorized, unsecured communications on Signal with individuals who are not government employees, jeopardizing national security and demonstrating a dangerous lack of judgment. He must be held accountable for his actions.
Read statement

MoveOn

Hegseth has shown he cannot be trusted with the power of this office and this position. Impeachment and aggressive oversight are necessary steps to stop further abuses.
Read statement

Win Without War

Hegseth is making people less safe — and it’s time for him to go.
Read statement