Volokh argues corporate speech limits would also threaten media corporations

Eugene VolokhUCLA law professor

Defended or excused

Volokh argued that denying business corporations speech rights would also deny them to media corporations.

“The constitutional protections offered to the institutional media are no greater than those offered to others. And thus if ordinary business corporations lack First Amendment rights, so do those business corporations that we call media corporations.”

Analysis

Open source (opens in a new tab)Volokh responds to the Citizens United dissent on corporate speechLessened Corporate First Amendment Rights and Media Corporations; final substantive paragraph

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

The west facade and columns of the U.S. Supreme Court Building in Washington.
Credit: Claire Anderson / CC0

Where this statement fits

Citizens United: Corporate election spending and free speech

The Supreme Court protected corporate and union independent election spending in Citizens United. Defenders say the ruling protects political speech and association. Critics say it gives wealthy interests excessive influence and undermines democratic accountability.

Read the full case

Source and context

Analysis

Volokh responds to the Citizens United dissent on corporate speech (opens in a new tab)Lessened Corporate First Amendment Rights and Media Corporations; final substantive paragraph

About this source

Volokh argues that reducing ordinary business corporations' speech rights would also threaten media corporations. His own analysis is distinct from his quotations of Stevens.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

He reviewed historical examples of press freedom protecting speakers outside professional newspapers.

After the quotation

This is the closing paragraph of his response to Stevens's dissent.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The dispute concerns constitutional protection for independent corporate election speech. Volokh defends that protection by rejecting a distinction that would strip ordinary corporations of rights while protecting media companies.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Eugene Volokh, Volokh argues corporate speech limits would also threaten media corporationsDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Volokh argues corporate speech limits would also threaten media corporations
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/6513-volokh-argued-that-denying-business-corporations-speech-rights

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Volokh argues corporate speech limits would also threaten media corporations". First published: 2026-10-22. Last updated: 2026-10-22. https://disputeindex.com/events/6513-volokh-argued-that-denying-business-corporations-speech-rights