Summer Lee backs overturning Citizens United to reduce corporate influence
Summer LeeU.S. representative from Pennsylvania
Lee supports overturning Citizens United, arguing that corporate and billionaire spending overwhelms ordinary voters.
“Some say the beginning of the collapse of our democracy was when the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Citizens United, giving the green light to corporations and billionaires to pour hundreds of millions into our elections and drown out the voices of everyday people. At the root of why we cannot make progress on so many urgent policies is a system where money speaks louder than people. The Citizens Over Corporations Amendment is about changing that. It is about putting power back where it belongs, with the people, so we can build a government that works for all of us, not just the wealthy few and their corporate interests,”
Official statement
Other statements by Summer Lee in this case
- Lee criticizes unlimited super PAC moneyLater: Condemned

Where this statement fits
Citizens United: Corporate election spending and free speech
The Supreme Court protected corporate and union independent election spending in Citizens United. Defenders say the ruling protects political speech and association. Critics say it gives wealthy interests excessive influence and undermines democratic accountability.
Source and context
Official statement
About this source
September 17, 2025 Senate release containing separately attributed statements from Schiff, McGovern and Lee about overturning Citizens United. The same quotations appeared in a later Neguse release.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
Lee joined lawmakers introducing an amendment that would reverse Citizens United and permit limits on election spending.
After the quotation
The announcement described the amendment as allowing Congress and states to set viewpoint-neutral spending limits while protecting freedom of the press.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
Lee argues that the spending system enabled by Citizens United gives wealthy interests too much political power. She supports reversing the ruling.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Supreme Court of the United States
More from this case
Read the full caseJackson supports overturning Citizens United
“I'm 100% uh about overturning Citizens United”Read statement
Waldman says Musk's election spending should be made illegal again
“A reckless Supreme Court and moribund Federal Election Commission took care of that. It should be made illegal again.”Read statement
Sanders calls for ending Citizens United and super PACs
“If we’re going to create a government that works for all, and not just the 1%, we have to end Citizens United, get super PACs out of elections, and move to public financing of elections.”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Summer Lee backs overturning Citizens United to reduce corporate influence
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/6288-lee-supports-overturning-citizens-united-arguing-that-corporate
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Summer Lee backs overturning Citizens United to reduce corporate influence". First published: 2026-10-20. Last updated: 2026-10-20. https://disputeindex.com/events/6288-lee-supports-overturning-citizens-united-arguing-that-corporate