Lambert praises Roadster stunts but rejects their road legality

Fred LambertElectrek editor-in-chief commenting personally

Lambert praises the stunts but says he would not want them in a car, argues they will never be road legal and says they would probably invalidate the warranty.

“The stunts were truly impressive and congrats to those who made it happen. ... However, I don't think I'd want that in a car. It will never be road legal, probably nullifying your warranty.”

Original post

Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Fred Lambert offers a mixed assessment of Tesla's Roadster demonstrationOctober 15 post at 9:51 p.m. Eastern
A silver Tesla Roadster prototype displayed at its 2017 launch event.
Credit: Smnt

Where this statement fits

Elon Musk calls Tesla's Roadster a flying car; Roger Connor questions sustained-flight claims before the demo

Elon Musk says Tesla's new Roadster brings flying cars into the present. In Tesla's demonstration, a Roadster with no one aboard made jumps of a few seconds. Smithsonian curator Roger Connor, speaking beforehand, distinguished short hops from sustained flight.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original post

Fred Lambert offers a mixed assessment of Tesla's Roadster demonstration (opens in a new tab)October 15 post at 9:51 p.m. Eastern

About this source

Lambert praises the stunts while questioning road legality, warranty consequences and practical appeal. His post was published on October 15 in the United States.

Before the quotation

Lambert describes his response to the new Roadster as mixed and praises the stunts.

After the quotation

He also criticizes reductions in seating and range.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Reference point: Musk's description of the Roadster as a flying car. Lambert credits the stunts but says the capability will never be road legal and that he would not want it in a car, which disputes its value as a car feature. These are materially different judgments of the same design. Closest competing label: Challenged the characterization; it loses because he also credits the demonstration itself.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Fred Lambert, Lambert praises Roadster stunts but rejects their road legalityDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Lambert praises Roadster stunts but rejects their road legality
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/5958-lambert-praises-the-stunts-but-says-he-would

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Lambert praises Roadster stunts but rejects their road legality". First published: 2026-10-18. Last updated: 2026-10-18. https://disputeindex.com/events/5958-lambert-praises-the-stunts-but-says-he-would