MPA and NCTA argue the statute regulates video transactions

Motion Picture AssociationJoint institutional amicus brief with NCTA

MPA and NCTA defend a definition of consumer tied to video transactions rather than ordinary transactions with a business that also supplies videos.

“Congress enacted a targeted statute focused on video transactions”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Motion Picture Association amicus brief in Salazar v. ParamountBrief, summary of argument, pages 2-5
Paramount signs above the entrance to One Astor Plaza in Times Square.
Credit: Nielsoncaetanosalmeron

Where this statement fits

Paramount says a newsletter subscription does not confer video-privacy protections; Salazar disagrees

Paramount argues that the Video Privacy Protection Act protects a subscriber only when the subscription concerns audiovisual goods or services. Michael Salazar argues that his newsletter subscription is enough to qualify him as a consumer under the statute.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original text

Motion Picture Association amicus brief in Salazar v. Paramount (opens in a new tab)Brief, summary of argument, pages 2-5

About this source

An amicus submission addresses the disputed consumer definition under the Video Privacy Protection Act. It is an argument to the Supreme Court, not a ruling on liability.

Before the quotation

MPA and NCTA filed a brief supporting Paramount.

After the quotation

Their argument treats the video transaction as the statute's focus.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

MPA and NCTA support Paramount's narrower reading, arguing that Congress targeted video transactions. This defends the disputed limit on consumer status.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Paramount Skydance

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Motion Picture Association, MPA and NCTA argue the statute regulates video transactionsDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
MPA and NCTA argue the statute regulates video transactions
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/5922-mpa-and-ncta-defend-a-definition-of-consumer

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "MPA and NCTA argue the statute regulates video transactions". First published: 2026-10-17. Last updated: 2026-10-17. https://disputeindex.com/events/5922-mpa-and-ncta-defend-a-definition-of-consumer