WLF and TechFreedom back Paramount's narrower reading

Washington Legal FoundationJoint institutional amicus brief with TechFreedom

WLF and TechFreedom support Paramount, arguing that consumer status is limited to audiovisual transactions.

“Paramount’s got the better of the argument.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Washington Legal Foundation amicus brief in Salazar v. ParamountBrief, summary of argument, pages 1-4
Paramount signs above the entrance to One Astor Plaza in Times Square.
Credit: Nielsoncaetanosalmeron

Where this statement fits

Paramount says a newsletter subscription does not confer video-privacy protections; Salazar disagrees

Paramount argues that the Video Privacy Protection Act protects a subscriber only when the subscription concerns audiovisual goods or services. Michael Salazar argues that his newsletter subscription is enough to qualify him as a consumer under the statute.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original text

Washington Legal Foundation amicus brief in Salazar v. Paramount (opens in a new tab)Brief, summary of argument, pages 1-4

About this source

An amicus submission addresses the disputed consumer definition under the Video Privacy Protection Act. It is an argument to the Supreme Court, not a ruling on liability.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

This brief addresses the meaning of consumer under the Video Privacy Protection Act in Salazar v. Paramount.

After the quotation

They argue that a broader reading would exceed Congress's video-privacy focus.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

WLF and TechFreedom support Paramount's argument that VPPA consumer status requires an audiovisual transaction.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Paramount Skydance

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Washington Legal Foundation, WLF and TechFreedom back Paramount's narrower readingDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
WLF and TechFreedom back Paramount's narrower reading
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/5920-wlf-and-techfreedom-support-paramount-arguing-that-consumer

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "WLF and TechFreedom back Paramount's narrower reading". First published: 2026-10-17. Last updated: 2026-10-17. https://disputeindex.com/events/5920-wlf-and-techfreedom-support-paramount-arguing-that-consumer