NRF says the broader VPPA consumer reading is overbroad
National Retail FederationRetail trade association submitting an amicus brief
NRF backs Paramount, arguing that unrelated retail subscriptions and incidental website videos should not create VPPA consumer status.
“This arbitrary and overbroad application of the VPPA is not in line with the statutory language”
Original text
Where this statement fits
Paramount says a newsletter subscription does not confer video-privacy protections; Salazar disagrees
Paramount argues that the Video Privacy Protection Act protects a subscriber only when the subscription concerns audiovisual goods or services. Michael Salazar argues that his newsletter subscription is enough to qualify him as a consumer under the statute.
Source and context
Original text
About this source
An amicus submission addresses the disputed consumer definition under the Video Privacy Protection Act. It is an argument to the Supreme Court, not a ruling on liability.
Before the quotation
This brief addresses the meaning of consumer under the Video Privacy Protection Act in Salazar v. Paramount.
After the quotation
The brief presents the author's argument about statutory coverage.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
NRF supports Paramount's requirement that the customer relationship concern video services. It defends that limit by criticizing claims based on unrelated retail subscriptions.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Paramount Skydance
More from this case
Read the full caseClement argues statutory context limits the relevant goods and services
“it takes its meaning from the immediate surrounding text.”Read statement
Hammack argues the VPPA consumer definition is not limited to video subscriptions
“not in the definition of "consumer." That choice is dispositive.”Read statement
U.S. Chamber says statutory context supports Paramount
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
“Salazar’s reading is not textualism but literalism”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- NRF says the broader VPPA consumer reading is overbroad
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/5919-nrf-backs-paramount-arguing-that-unrelated-retail-subscriptions
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "NRF says the broader VPPA consumer reading is overbroad". First published: 2026-10-17. Last updated: 2026-10-17. https://disputeindex.com/events/5919-nrf-backs-paramount-arguing-that-unrelated-retail-subscriptions