Ferguson supports repair rights but opposes filing the Deere complaint

Andrew N. FergusonFTC commissioner, in a dissent joined by Melissa Holyoak

Ferguson, joined by Holyoak, supports repair rights but opposes filing the complaint on timing, evidence and settlement-negotiation grounds.

“I recognize that the right to repair one’s own equipment matters a great deal. And I favor right-to-repair legislation. ... But I must dissent from the filing of today’s Complaint on three procedural grounds.”

Official statement

Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Ferguson and Holyoak dissent from filing the Deere complaintJoint dissent, pages 2-3
A green John Deere 8R tractor at the Agritechnica trade show.
Credit: MB-one

Where this statement fits

John Deere agrees to expand repair access after disputing the FTC's monopoly allegations

The FTC and states alleged that Deere reserved fully functional repair software for authorized dealers, raising costs and delaying repairs. Deere disputed that account. In July 2026, the parties announced an agreement expanding access to repair tools.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Official statement

Ferguson and Holyoak dissent from filing the Deere complaint (opens in a new tab)Joint dissent, pages 2-3

About this source

The commissioners support repair rights but oppose filing at this stage on procedural, evidentiary and settlement-negotiation grounds.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

The FTC complaint alleged that Deere restricted access to fully functional repair software.

After the quotation

Ferguson favors settling only if the agreement provides real benefits to farmers. His objections concern the filing's timing, evidentiary basis and effect on negotiations.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Relative to the FTC's allegation that Deere's repair restrictions were unlawful, Ferguson neither defends nor condemns the restrictions. He backs repair rights and a settlement that gives farmers real benefits, but opposes the suit itself and says the evidence is too thin to file with confidence. We labeled it Mixed or conditional because his support for the complaint's goal and his opposition to filing it are materially different positions.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
John Deere

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Andrew N. Ferguson, Ferguson supports repair rights but opposes filing the Deere complaintDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Ferguson supports repair rights but opposes filing the Deere complaint
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/5910-ferguson-joined-by-holyoak-supports-repair-rights-but

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Ferguson supports repair rights but opposes filing the Deere complaint". First published: 2026-10-17. Last updated: 2026-10-17. https://disputeindex.com/events/5910-ferguson-joined-by-holyoak-supports-repair-rights-but