Freedom of the Press Foundation calls the ruling a "stinging defeat" for the press ban
Freedom of the Press FoundationPress-freedom nonprofit, in a post on its Bluesky account
The Freedom of the Press Foundation said Judge Kelly's ruling was a defeat for Trump's actions against the press and a vindication of the First Amendment, and said presidents cannot use their power to remove journalists over their reporting.
“This decision is a stinging defeat for Trump's assault on the free press and a powerful vindication of the First Amendment. As Judge Kelly recognized, presidents don't get to use their power to purge journalists because they don't like what they report.”
Original post
Where this statement fits
Should President Trump bar CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House over their coverage?
On Friday, September 18, 2026, President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social that, "effective immediately, I am banning" CNN, MS NOW and Politico "from the White House as a result of their constant 'reporting' FAKE NEWS!" About an hour later, in the Oval Office, he said no particular story prompted the decision, that he does not want the outlets "in my office," and that "somebody has a right to keep them away" if outlets write false stories. The three outlets and press-freedom groups oppose the exclusion, citing constitutional protection for the press, and the White House Correspondents' Association said it "stands in defense of our colleagues at CNN, MSNOW, and POLITICO." On Saturday, September 19, MS NOW, CNN and Politico said their White House reporters were refused entry and had press passes confiscated; the White House referred questions to Trump's earlier remarks. The dispute is over whether President Trump should exclude named news organizations from White House access over what they report.
Source and context
Original post
About this source
Freedom of the Press Foundation post on Bluesky on October 14, 2026 responding to Judge Timothy Kelly's preliminary injunction against the White House press ban.
Before the quotation
On October 13 Judge Timothy Kelly granted CNN, MS NOW and Politico a preliminary injunction, finding the ban likely violated the First and Fifth Amendments.
After the quotation
The post links to the foundation's own article on the ruling.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The case asks whether President Trump should bar CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House over their coverage. The foundation welcomes the injunction and says presidents cannot purge journalists over their reporting. That opposes the ban, so we labeled it Condemned. The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional; it loses because the post supports no part of the ban.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseReporters Committee says the injunction ends a "blatantly unconstitutional attempt" to punish news outlets
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
“The court has put an end to a blatantly unconstitutional attempt to punish news outlets for coverage the president doesn't like. The decision protects not only CNN, MS NOW, and Politico, but all the other holders of White House passes who continued to work under the threat of retaliation — and of course the public, which deserves timely and accurate information from a press corps free from government intimidation.”Read statement
CNN chief Mark Thompson says the network will fight the ban "to the end"
“To me, it's a vote of confidence in free speech and our right, not really so much for ourselves but on behalf of the public everywhere ... No matter how many court cases, investigations, court appearances, and all the expense that that entails, we will fight this one to the end”Read statement
Boutrous says the court was right to block the White House press ban
“The harm this ban did to our clients, the First Amendment, and the public as a whole is profound ... The Court was right to enjoin the White House from enforcing this ‘unconstitutional ban on the free press’ for the foreseeable future.”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Freedom of the Press Foundation calls the ruling a "stinging defeat" for the press ban
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/5877-the-freedom-of-the-press-foundation-said-judge
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Freedom of the Press Foundation calls the ruling a "stinging defeat" for the press ban". First published: 2026-10-16. Last updated: 2026-10-16. https://disputeindex.com/events/5877-the-freedom-of-the-press-foundation-said-judge