DOJ calls D.C. Guard deployment successful

United States Department of JusticeDeputy Assistant Attorney General Eric D. McArthur, arguing for the federal government in the D.C. Circuit

DOJ's lawyer told the appeals court the Guard deployment was lawful and called it a success, citing the mayor's acknowledgment that violent crime had fallen.

Responding to

Federal law, including the D.C. militia code, authorizes the National Guard deployments in Washington.

“a striking success, with even the D.C. mayor acknowledging the dramatic decrease in violent crime since the deployments began”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)District of Columbia v. Trump, No. 25-5418 (D.C. Cir.): courtroom minutes of oral argument · United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia CircuitCourtroom minutes filed October 14, 2026 (Doc. 2198015)

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)Appeals court weighs President Trump's power to deploy National Guard in DCKatie Barlow report, Eric McArthur argument

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)DC urges appeals court to end yearlong National Guard deployment in capital · Courthouse News ServiceArgument report: panel, Reich and McArthur arguments, stay history

Where this statement fits

Trump administration defends D.C. National Guard deployment on appeal

A three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit heard argument on October 14, 2026 in the Trump administration's appeal of a ruling against its National Guard deployment in Washington. Justice Department lawyer Eric McArthur told the court the deployments were lawful under the D.C. militia code and federal law, and called the mission a striking success. D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb said afterward that using the military to police the city's streets violates the law. District Judge Jia Cobb granted the District a preliminary injunction against the deployment on November 20, 2025. On December 17, 2025, the D.C. Circuit put that order on hold for the rest of the appeal. The panel did not rule at the hearing.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original text

District of Columbia v. Trump, No. 25-5418 (D.C. Cir.): courtroom minutes of oral argument (opens in a new tab) · United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia CircuitCourtroom minutes filed October 14, 2026 (Doc. 2198015)

About this source

Court minutes of the October 14, 2026 argument, as mirrored by CourtListener (RECAP). They list Circuit Judges Pillard and Garcia and Senior Circuit Judge Rogers, and name Eric D. McArthur of DOJ as counsel for the federal appellants and Mitchell P. Reich of the D.C. Office of the Attorney General as counsel for the District.

Reporting

Appeals court weighs President Trump's power to deploy National Guard in DC (opens in a new tab)Katie Barlow report, Eric McArthur argument

About this source

Original hearing reporting quotes DOJ's defense and describes questions to both sides. Oral argument is not a merits decision.

Reporting

DC urges appeals court to end yearlong National Guard deployment in capital (opens in a new tab) · Courthouse News ServiceArgument report: panel, Reich and McArthur arguments, stay history

About this source

Courthouse News report on the October 14 argument. It names the panel, reports the arguments of Mitchell Reich for the District and Eric McArthur for the government, and gives the December 2025 stay history. Its view of how the panel leaned is the reporter's assessment.

Before the quotation

In remarks reported by FOX 5 DC, McArthur opened the government's October 14 argument by saying the president had ordered the Secretary of Defense to mobilize the D.C. National Guard and to work with governors to bring in Guard units from other states. He said the mission had been, by any measure,

After the quotation

He argued that the deployments were lawful under the D.C. militia code and federal law. He also warned that the District's reading would keep the Guard from missions such as inaugurations, large demonstrations and disaster relief.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Speaking for the government, McArthur defends the deployment under scrutiny as lawful and successful.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: United States Department of Justice, DOJ calls D.C. Guard deployment successfulDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
DOJ calls D.C. Guard deployment successful
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/5763-doj-s-lawyer-told-the-appeals-court-the

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "DOJ calls D.C. Guard deployment successful". First published: 2026-10-15. Last updated: 2026-10-15. https://disputeindex.com/events/5763-doj-s-lawyer-told-the-appeals-court-the