Cruz urges review of Eastman's disbarment

Ted CruzU.S. senator for Texas

Cruz argues that the discipline threatens protected legal advocacy and access to independent counsel.

Responding to

Eastman's disbarment infringes protected attorney advocacy and threatens clients' access to independent counsel.

“Action: Submitted a joint amicus brief with Mike Lee urging Supreme Court review of John Eastman's California disbarment.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Brief for U.S. Senators Ted Cruz and Mike Lee as Amici Curiae in Support of PetitionerNo. 26-336; Interest of Amici Curiae and Summary of the Argument

Where this statement fits

Ted Cruz and Mike Lee urge Supreme Court review of John Eastman's disbarment

The California Supreme Court disbarred John Eastman on April 15, 2026 after disciplinary proceedings over his work concerning the 2020 election. On October 14, Ted Cruz and Mike Lee submitted a Supreme Court brief urging review. They argue that the discipline punishes protected advocacy and chills independent legal representation. The State Bar said in April that the discipline was warranted by clear and convincing evidence that Eastman advanced false claims about the 2020 election, and that attorneys must act honestly regardless of the client they represent. It waived its right to respond to the petition on October 9. The docket lists a pending petition, not a decision on the discipline.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original text

Brief for U.S. Senators Ted Cruz and Mike Lee as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioner (opens in a new tab)No. 26-336; Interest of Amici Curiae and Summary of the Argument

About this source

Amicus brief submitted October 14, 2026 on behalf of both senators. It argues that the disbarment violates the Free Speech and Petition Clauses and asks the Court to grant review.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

The senators submitted the brief in support of Eastman's pending certiorari petition.

After the quotation

Their brief seeks review and does not establish that the Supreme Court has granted it.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Relative to Eastman's disbarment, the brief Cruz joined argues that the sanction punishes protected legal advocacy and fails strict scrutiny. That criticizes the disbarment itself rather than how it is described.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

State Bar says the evidence warranted Eastman's disbarment

State Bar of California

“After extensive proceedings before the State Bar Court’s Hearing and Review Departments, both of which found Mr. Eastman culpable of serious ethical violations, the Court has imposed the discipline warranted by the clear and convincing evidence that he advanced false claims about the 2020 presidential election to mislead courts, public officials, and the American public.”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Ted Cruz, Cruz urges review of Eastman's disbarmentDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Cruz urges review of Eastman's disbarment
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/5758-cruz-argues-that-the-discipline-threatens-protected-legal

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Cruz urges review of Eastman's disbarment". First published: 2026-10-15. Last updated: 2026-10-15. https://disputeindex.com/events/5758-cruz-argues-that-the-discipline-threatens-protected-legal