Charles Van Morgan says he opposes Flock-style license plate networks and supports their removal

Charles Van MorganIndependent candidate for governor of Tennessee, in an emailed statement

In an email to Dispute Index on October 13, 2026, Charles Van Morgan, an independent candidate for governor of Tennessee, said he opposes Flock-style automated license plate surveillance networks and supports their removal. He said he has no objection to ordinary traffic cameras but that interconnected plate readers able to track people's movements are an unacceptable intrusion on privacy.

“I oppose Flock-style automated license plate surveillance networks and support their removal. Freedom should be the rule, not government surveillance. I have no objection to ordinary traffic cameras used to observe road conditions. However, interconnected license plate readers capable of tracking citizens' movements and reconstructing their daily lives are an unacceptable intrusion on personal privacy.”

Emailed statement

Read the full email
Mr. Weller, I oppose Flock-style automated license plate surveillance networks and support their removal. Freedom should be the rule, not government surveillance. I have no objection to ordinary traffic cameras used to observe road conditions. However, interconnected license plate readers capable of tracking citizens' movements and reconstructing their daily lives are an unacceptable intrusion on personal privacy. Government should not continuously monitor millions of innocent motorists simply because the technology exists. If an extraordinary emergency or legitimate national security threat creates a specific need for such technology, its temporary deployment should require independent judicial authorization, except when immediate action is necessary to protect human life. If we need these systems for a genuine emergency, we can install them when necessary. We do not need to sacrifice everyone's privacy today out of fear of what might happen tomorrow. I also oppose private companies collecting, retaining, selling, or sharing this surveillance information. Charles Van Morgan Independent Candidate for Governor of Tennessee
Emailed statement from Charles Van Morgan to Dispute Index on Flock license-plate cameras · Charles Van MorganEmailed statement from Charles Van Morgan, October 13, 2026 (UTC).
A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

Where this statement fits

Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.

Read the full case

Case updates

Keep up with who wants to ban, limit or keep Flock cameras

Get an email if a candidate or official takes a new position on plate-reader networks, or if a city, legislature or court acts on them.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Emailed statement

Emailed statement from Charles Van Morgan to Dispute Index on Flock license-plate cameras
Mr. Weller, I oppose Flock-style automated license plate surveillance networks and support their removal. Freedom should be the rule, not government surveillance. I have no objection to ordinary traffic cameras used to observe road conditions. However, interconnected license plate readers capable of tracking citizens' movements and reconstructing their daily lives are an unacceptable intrusion on personal privacy. Government should not continuously monitor millions of innocent motorists simply because the technology exists. If an extraordinary emergency or legitimate national security threat creates a specific need for such technology, its temporary deployment should require independent judicial authorization, except when immediate action is necessary to protect human life. If we need these systems for a genuine emergency, we can install them when necessary. We do not need to sacrifice everyone's privacy today out of fear of what might happen tomorrow. I also oppose private companies collecting, retaining, selling, or sharing this surveillance information. Charles Van Morgan Independent Candidate for Governor of Tennessee
· Charles Van MorganEmailed statement from Charles Van Morgan, October 13, 2026 (UTC).

About this source

Emailed reply from Charles Van Morgan, an independent candidate for governor of Tennessee, to a Dispute Index question on Flock-style license plate camera networks. He opposes the networks and supports their removal, with a narrow exception for emergencies under judicial authorization.

Before the quotation

Dispute Index asked Morgan's campaign on September 30, October 5 and October 13 whether he supports, opposes or wants changes to the use of Flock-style license plate camera networks in Tennessee, and which changes.

After the quotation

He went on to say that government should not continuously monitor innocent motorists, that temporary deployment for an extraordinary emergency or national security threat should require independent judicial authorization except when immediate action is needed to protect human life, and that he opposes private companies collecting, retaining, selling or sharing the data. As of October 13, 2026, we did not find an earlier public statement from him on the cameras.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. Morgan opposes the networks and supports their removal, so we labeled it Condemned with the Ban or remove step. He allows temporary use in an extraordinary emergency with independent judicial authorization, which is a narrow exception to removal rather than a plan to keep the systems.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Charles Van Morgan, Charles Van Morgan says he opposes Flock-style license plate networks and supports their removalDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Charles Van Morgan says he opposes Flock-style license plate networks and supports their removal
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/5669-in-an-email-to-dispute-index-on-october

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Charles Van Morgan says he opposes Flock-style license plate networks and supports their removal". First published: 2026-10-13. Last updated: 2026-10-13. https://disputeindex.com/events/5669-in-an-email-to-dispute-index-on-october