Kathleen Schmidt says it is "short-sighted" to use AI for publicity copy and pitches

Kathleen SchmidtBook publicist and author of the Publishing Confidential newsletter, in a newsletter post

Book publicist Kathleen Schmidt said she agrees it is short-sighted to use AI to write publicity copy and pitches, because they would all start sounding the same, while saying AI-powered media databases are useful in publicity work.

“I agree it is short-sighted to use them for publicity copy and pitches, because if that becomes the norm, all pitches and publicity copy will start sounding the same.”

Analysis

Open source (opens in a new tab)Big Publishers Are Using AI. It Doesn't Surprise Me.Publicity copy, Podseeker example and closing discussion of AI guidelines
A laptop resting on a stack of books on a wooden table.
Credit: Nenad Stojkovic (Shixart1985) / CC BY 2.0

Where this statement fits

Should book publishers use AI tools in their internal workflows?

WIRED's October 9, 2026 report documents disagreement over publishers' internal AI use. Simon & Schuster's Wibke Grutjen defends optional, approved tools. Literary agent Emma Dries prefers a ban, or clearer disclosure. Publicist Kathleen Schmidt accepts administrative assistance but rejects AI-written publicity pitches.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Analysis

Big Publishers Are Using AI. It Doesn't Surprise Me. (opens in a new tab)Publicity copy, Podseeker example and closing discussion of AI guidelines

About this source

Schmidt distinguishes AI-written publicity from administrative assistance and calls for clearer rules.

Before the quotation

Schmidt was writing about Adam Morgan's WIRED article, in which publishing employees described publishers using AI for publicity copy and pitches, and a Big Five publicist called using AI to generate publicity copy short-sighted.

After the quotation

She went on to say that media databases powered by AI are "a good thing" for building media lists.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The case asks whether book publishers should use AI tools in their internal workflows. Schmidt agrees "it is short-sighted to use them for publicity copy and pitches" but says an AI-powered media database is "a good thing". Because she opposes one use and supports another, we labeled it Mixed or conditional. The closest competing label is Condemned; it loses because she endorses AI for media research.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Kathleen Schmidt says it is "short-sighted" to use AI for publicity copy and pitches
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/5464-book-publicist-kathleen-schmidt-said-she-agrees-it

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Kathleen Schmidt says it is "short-sighted" to use AI for publicity copy and pitches". First published: 2026-10-11. Last updated: 2026-10-11. https://disputeindex.com/events/5464-book-publicist-kathleen-schmidt-said-she-agrees-it