Government says ICE ran "query checks to positively identify" Almonte before his arrest warrant

U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New YorkGovernment counsel for the respondents, in a June 17, 2026 filing quoted in the court's October 5 order

Government lawyers told the court that ICE ran query checks that positively identified Almonte, determined he lacked lawful status, and issued an administrative arrest warrant at about 5:50 p.m.

Responding to

ICE positively identified Angel Almonte through database query checks before issuing his arrest warrant.

“ICE conducted query checks to positively identify the Petitioner, determined that he was not present in the United States with lawful status, and issued a Form I-200, Warrant for Arrest of Alien (the “Arrest Warrant”) at approximately 5:50 p.m.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Memorandum and Order, Almonte v. Genalo, No. 2:26-cv-03633 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 5, 2026)28-page Memorandum and Order, docket entry 23; findings on pages 2, 11-16 and 22-28

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Docket, Almonte v. Maldonado, No. 2:26-cv-03633 (E.D.N.Y.)Docket entries from June 17 to October 5, 2026
A Homeland Security Investigations agent, seen from behind, outside a Brooklyn apartment building during an arrest-warrant operation at night.
Credit: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement / Wikimedia Commons (public domain)

Where this statement fits

Did ICE agents falsify records and testimony in the Bronx arrests of Angel Almonte and Jeury Concepcion?

On May 6, 2026, ICE agents arrested Angel Almonte, a Dominican immigrant, and Jeury Concepcion, a 19-year-old U.S. citizen, in separate arrests in the Bronx. DHS said Concepcion was not arrested by ICE and that it does not arrest citizens by mistake, and government lawyers told a federal court that ICE positively identified Almonte through database checks before issuing his arrest warrant. On October 5, U.S. District Judge Gary R. Brown ruled that the misidentification claims were baseless, that ICE issued an after-the-fact warrant containing false information, and that the officers gave false and misleading testimony. The question is whether ICE agents falsified records and testimony to justify the arrests.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original text

Memorandum and Order, Almonte v. Genalo, No. 2:26-cv-03633 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 5, 2026) (opens in a new tab)28-page Memorandum and Order, docket entry 23; findings on pages 2, 11-16 and 22-28

About this source

Federal court ruling on Angel Almonte's habeas petition, issued after a June 26, 2026 factual hearing at which the arresting ICE officers testified. Obtained from the CourtListener RECAP archive.

Original text

Docket, Almonte v. Maldonado, No. 2:26-cv-03633 (E.D.N.Y.) (opens in a new tab)Docket entries from June 17 to October 5, 2026

About this source

Federal court docket for Angel Almonte's habeas petition, as mirrored by CourtListener, including the order to show cause, the June 25 order keeping the factual hearing and the June 26 release order.

Before the quotation

Almonte petitioned for release on June 17, 2026, and the court ordered the government to show cause why he should remain detained.

After the quotation

The October 5 order says that all of these assertions would prove to be false and that database searches run before the warrant was issued came back negative.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is whether ICE agents falsified records and testimony to justify the arrests of Almonte and Concepcion. The government's filing says ICE "conducted query checks to positively identify the Petitioner" before issuing the warrant. That defends the arrest as properly grounded, so we labeled it Defended or excused. The closest competing label is Challenged characterization, which would fit a dispute over how the arrest was described alone; the filing asserts the arrest's basis.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Government says ICE ran "query checks to positively identify" Almonte before his arrest warrant
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/5352-government-lawyers-told-the-court-that-ice-ran

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Government says ICE ran "query checks to positively identify" Almonte before his arrest warrant". First published: 2026-10-09. Last updated: 2026-10-09. https://disputeindex.com/events/5352-government-lawyers-told-the-court-that-ice-ran