Jones criticizes the White House press ban
Tom JonesPoynter media columnist
Jones said the White House ban appeared to violate the outlets' First Amendment rights. He contrasted the administration's national-security argument with Trump's initial comments about their coverage.
“All indications are that Trump’s ban from the White House violates the news outlets’ First Amendment rights.”
Analysis
Where this statement fits
Should President Trump bar CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House over their coverage?
On Friday, September 18, 2026, President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social that, "effective immediately, I am banning" CNN, MS NOW and Politico "from the White House as a result of their constant 'reporting' FAKE NEWS!" About an hour later, in the Oval Office, he said no particular story prompted the decision, that he does not want the outlets "in my office," and that "somebody has a right to keep them away" if outlets write false stories. The three outlets and press-freedom groups oppose the exclusion, citing constitutional protection for the press, and the White House Correspondents' Association said it "stands in defense of our colleagues at CNN, MSNOW, and POLITICO." On Saturday, September 19, MS NOW, CNN and Politico said their White House reporters were refused entry and had press passes confiscated; the White House referred questions to Trump's earlier remarks. The dispute is over whether President Trump should exclude named news organizations from White House access over what they report.
Source and context
Analysis
About this source
Jones offers his assessment of the constitutional implications of the White House ban. His opinion is distinct from a court ruling. The column also discusses other media stories.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
In the Trump bans Politico section, Jones describes the outlets' attempt to obtain further court protection.
After the quotation
Jones discusses the administration's national-security argument, Trump's initial comments and the outlets' attorney's criticism.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
Jones rejects the exclusion as a likely violation of press rights. He is giving his own assessment rather than reporting a final court judgment.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Donald Trump
More from this case
Read the full caseBlanche says being in the White House is a privilege, not a right, after CNN is dropped from the Air Force One pool
“The president has every right to decide who gets to fly on his plane, and it is national security, especially on Air Force One, and especially at the White House. Being in the White House is a privilege; it's not a right.”Read statement
Trump tells MS NOW's Akayla Gardner to "be quiet" and calls her network "fake news"
“No, no, no. I want real news, not fake news — like you. I want- Listen. I want real news. I love an open, free press. What I don't like is the fake… Wait, wait, be quiet. What I don't like is fake news. And they're fake news.”Read statement
Boutrous calls the TRO ruling "a strong ruling vindicating freedom of the press, due process and the rule of law"
“This is a strong ruling vindicating freedom of the press, due process and the rule of law. We greatly appreciate the court's swift action.”Read statement
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Jones criticizes the White House press ban
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/5269-jones-said-the-white-house-ban-appeared-to
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Jones criticizes the White House press ban". First published: 2026-10-09. Last updated: 2026-10-09. https://disputeindex.com/events/5269-jones-said-the-white-house-ban-appeared-to