Josephine County Sheriff Dave Daniel says "FLOCK ALPRs are no longer activated in rural Josephine County" and the Sheriff's Office contract has ended

Dave DanielSheriff of Josephine County, Oregon, and candidate for re-election

Mixed or conditional

In a Josephine County Sheriff's Office release reported on August 13, 2026, Sheriff Dave Daniel said he asked county legal counsel to send Flock a termination-for-convenience letter, that Flock license plate readers are no longer activated in rural Josephine County, and that the Sheriff's Office contract has ended. Jefferson Public Radio reports he also said the technology has been beneficial in solving crime and that much of the county is not ready or willing to accept it.

“Effective immediately, FLOCK ALPRs are no longer activated in rural Josephine County and the contract with the Sheriff’s Office has ended.”

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)JCSO terminates contract with license plate reader company FlockParagraph 4 (Daniel quoted)

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)Josephine County drops Flock cameras over privacy concernsDaniel's quoted statement, second and third body paragraphs

Case updates

Keep up with who wants to ban, limit or keep Flock cameras

Get an email if a candidate or official takes a new position on plate-reader networks, or if a city, legislature or court acts on them.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

Where this statement fits

Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.

Read the full case

Source and context

Reporting

JCSO terminates contract with license plate reader company Flock (opens in a new tab)Paragraph 4 (Daniel quoted)

About this source

KQEN News Radio report on a Josephine County Sheriff's Office release ending the Flock license plate reader contract.

Reporting

Josephine County drops Flock cameras over privacy concerns (opens in a new tab)Daniel's quoted statement, second and third body paragraphs

About this source

Jefferson Public Radio report on Josephine County ending its Flock contract.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

KQEN reports a Sheriff's Office release saying the office had a contract for ten Flock cameras and that the equipment had been targeted and vandalized in recent months.

After the quotation

KQEN reports that some Flock equipment is still in the field but not in use, and that it is unknown when Flock will remove it.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. Daniel says "FLOCK ALPRs are no longer activated in rural Josephine County and the contract with the Sheriff's Office has ended." That stops use of the system and names no replacement. Jefferson Public Radio reports he credited the technology with helping solve crimes and said much of the county is not ready to accept it, so he ends this contract without condemning plate readers as such. That fits Mixed or conditional and Ban or remove. The closest competing label is Condemned, which would fit a statement that the cameras themselves are a harm; his statement credits their benefit.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Jacob Burnett says Flock-style cameras should be done away with, with warrants required if they stay

Jacob Burnett

“The systems themselves can be modified to prevent nearly all abuse and be made more secure by requiring warrants for access or follow through on any data the systems collect and have all data stored on the hardware itself preventing viewing from remote locations, requiring strict login credentials and a connecting warrant number to access. These are common sense changes that if the systems are to be used I feel could correct a lot of abuse or privacy concerns but I also feel the systems should be done away with overall, especially in the realm of predictive crime analytics.”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Dave Daniel, Josephine County Sheriff Dave Daniel says "FLOCK ALPRs are no longer activated in rural Josephine County" and the Sheriff's Office contract has endedDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Josephine County Sheriff Dave Daniel says "FLOCK ALPRs are no longer activated in rural Josephine County" and the Sheriff's Office contract has ended
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/5242-in-a-josephine-county-sheriff-s-office-release

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Josephine County Sheriff Dave Daniel says "FLOCK ALPRs are no longer activated in rural Josephine County" and the Sheriff's Office contract has ended". First published: 2026-10-09. Last updated: 2026-10-09. https://disputeindex.com/events/5242-in-a-josephine-county-sheriff-s-office-release