Nanette Barragán says the lack of federal limits on plate-reader data "is not acceptable"

Nanette BarragánU.S. representative for California's 44th district and candidate for re-election, in a statement sent to Dispute Index by her communications director

Rep. Nanette Barragán said that few meaningful federal limits govern how license plate data is collected, stored or shared, that companies are not held accountable, and that this makes it easier for agencies such as ICE to use the data against immigrant families. She said the country can have both public safety and privacy but not a surveillance state that tracks people without accountability, and that she will keep pushing in Congress to close that gap.

“Right now, there are few meaningful federal limits on how this kind of data is collected, stored, or shared. There is also a failure to hold companies accountable or put strict rules in place on the use and collection of data. That is not acceptable. When there are no real limits on who can access this data, it becomes easier for agencies like ICE to use it against immigrant families and working communities, the very people our public safety systems should be protecting, not putting at risk. This is about more than privacy. It is about whether people can go to work, visit a doctor, or move through their communities without being tracked and having that information used against them. We can have public safety and privacy. What we cannot have is a surveillance state that tracks people without accountability, and I will keep pushing in Congress to close that gap.”

Emailed statement

Read the full email
Right now, there are few meaningful federal limits on how this kind of data is collected, stored, or shared. There is also a failure to hold companies accountable or put strict rules in place on the use and collection of data. That is not acceptable. When there are no real limits on who can access this data, it becomes easier for agencies like ICE to use it against immigrant families and working communities, the very people our public safety systems should be protecting, not putting at risk. This is about more than privacy. It is about whether people can go to work, visit a doctor, or move through their communities without being tracked and having that information used against them. We can have public safety and privacy. What we cannot have is a surveillance state that tracks people without accountability, and I will keep pushing in Congress to close that gap.
Statement from Rep. Nanette Barragán on Flock-style license plate cameras, sent to Dispute Index · Nanette BarragánStatement emailed by Rep. Barragán's communications director, October 8, 2026 (UTC).
A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

Where this statement fits

Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.

Read the full case

Case updates

Keep up with who wants to ban, limit or keep Flock cameras

Get an email if a candidate or official takes a new position on plate-reader networks, or if a city, legislature or court acts on them.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Emailed statement

Statement from Rep. Nanette Barragán on Flock-style license plate cameras, sent to Dispute Index
Right now, there are few meaningful federal limits on how this kind of data is collected, stored, or shared. There is also a failure to hold companies accountable or put strict rules in place on the use and collection of data. That is not acceptable. When there are no real limits on who can access this data, it becomes easier for agencies like ICE to use it against immigrant families and working communities, the very people our public safety systems should be protecting, not putting at risk. This is about more than privacy. It is about whether people can go to work, visit a doctor, or move through their communities without being tracked and having that information used against them. We can have public safety and privacy. What we cannot have is a surveillance state that tracks people without accountability, and I will keep pushing in Congress to close that gap.
· Nanette BarragánStatement emailed by Rep. Barragán's communications director, October 8, 2026 (UTC).

About this source

Statement from Rep. Nanette Barragán on Flock-style license plate cameras, sent to Dispute Index by her communications director, Jin Choi, who said the campaign had given it for a questionnaire. The link goes to her campaign website because the statement is not posted there.

Before the quotation

Dispute Index asked Rep. Barragán's office whether she supports, opposes or wants changes to Flock-style license plate camera networks. Her communications director, Jin Choi, replied with the statement and said the campaign had given it for a questionnaire.

After the quotation

We could not locate the questionnaire in which the campaign first published the statement.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. Barragán condemns the absence of limits on collection, storage and sharing, and its use by ICE, but does not call for ending the systems and says public safety and privacy can coexist, so we labeled it Mixed or conditional and placed it at Limit retention and use. The closest competing label is Condemned. It loses because her objection is to unregulated use, not to the cameras themselves.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Delegate May Nivar welcomes Henrico and Goochland moving away from Flock and calls for safeguards

May Nivar

“I’m encouraged that Henrico and Goochland have each decided to move away from Flock cameras after hearing residents’ concerns about privacy and accountability. Public safety and privacy are not competing values. Law enforcement needs effective tools, but those tools must be used responsibly and with appropriate safeguards. ... As the General Assembly revisits this issue next session, we must work toward the right balance between public safety, privacy, accountability, and the authority of local communities to make decisions that reflect their residents’ values.”
Read statement

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Nanette Barragán says the lack of federal limits on plate-reader data "is not acceptable"
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/5213-rep-nanette-barrag%C3%A1n-said-that-few-meaningful-federal

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Nanette Barragán says the lack of federal limits on plate-reader data "is not acceptable"". First published: 2026-10-08. Last updated: 2026-10-08. https://disputeindex.com/events/5213-rep-nanette-barrag%C3%A1n-said-that-few-meaningful-federal