Flock defends its safeguards and disputes California liability
Flock SafetyCorporate defendant speaking through its court-filed motion
Flock defends its practices and argues that the California plaintiffs have not established a basis for liability.
Responding to
Flock is not liable under the California plaintiffs' theories because customers control sharing, its practices meet its duties and the alleged harm is insufficiently pleaded.
“Sharing options are customer-controlled: each customer can choose to share access to its data with others on a one-to-one basis or on a geographic basis.”
Original text
Where this statement fits
Should Flock Safety be held liable for misuse of its license-plate surveillance network?
Lawsuits in Colorado, Georgia and California seek to hold Flock Safety responsible for alleged privacy violations, unsafe safeguards or police misuse of its network. Flock says police interpret location evidence and customers control data sharing, and it disputes the California claims. The cases raise different questions about the company's legal duties and responsibility.
Source and context
Original text
About this source
Flock disputes its liability, says customers control sharing, defends its safeguards and argues that plaintiffs have not pleaded concrete harm.
Before the quotation
The consolidated complaint alleges unlawful sharing, inadequate controls and privacy injury.
After the quotation
The defense also disputes concrete injury and the application of California's public-agency sharing rule to a private company.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The motion justifies the company's disputed practices and argues that they satisfy its duties.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Flock Safety
More from this case
Read the full caseFlock says police interpreted accurate vehicle-location evidence
Flock Safety
“As noted in the complaint, the Flock system accurately identified the location of Ms. Elser’s vehicle, while law enforcement retained responsibility for interpreting and weighing that information as part of the broader investigation.”Read statement
McNulty seeks an injunction against Flock's tracking practices
“We're looking to get Flock an injunction, stopping Flock from doing this across the country and here in Colorado as well,”Read statement
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Flock defends its safeguards and disputes California liability
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/5189-flock-defends-its-practices-and-argues-that-the
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Flock defends its safeguards and disputes California liability". First published: 2026-10-07. Last updated: 2026-10-07. https://disputeindex.com/events/5189-flock-defends-its-practices-and-argues-that-the