Ellington denies intentional misconduct

Jeff EllingtonRunbeck Election Services president and CEO

Ellington acknowledges the mistake and explicitly denies that Runbeck intentionally released the packets early.

Responding to

The early ballot release resulted from an accidental mailing error, not intentional misconduct.

“It was pure accident, just a human error ... We regret it. But it was by no means intentional.”

Official statement

Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Runbeck Election Services statement on the October 1 delivery of vote-by-mail packets · Runbeck Election ServicesComplete one-page statement dated October 4, 2026

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)Board reacts after 3,000+ Maricopa County mail-in ballots mailed early (AZFamily)Full report, first published October 4 at 6:40 p.m. MST, updated October 5; Ellington's denial, Richer's response and process review
Ballot-printing equipment at Runbeck Election Services.
Credit: Runbeck Election Services, via Wikimedia Commons

Where this statement fits

Was Maricopa County's early ballot mailing deliberate misconduct, as Donald Trump claimed?

Runbeck mailed 3,126 Maricopa County ballots six days before the scheduled date. Donald Trump called the county dishonest and rejected the explanation of an error. Runbeck's CEO denied intentional misconduct, while other officials and commentators disputed the incident's meaning.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Official statement

Runbeck Election Services statement on the October 1 delivery of vote-by-mail packets (opens in a new tab) · Runbeck Election ServicesComplete one-page statement dated October 4, 2026

About this source

Runbeck says 3,126 vote-by-mail packets reached the Postal Service on October 1, six days before schedule, when a pallet was included with mail released that evening. It says the packets are valid and that it added verification steps for staged mail.

Reporting

Board reacts after 3,000+ Maricopa County mail-in ballots mailed early (AZFamily) (opens in a new tab)Full report, first published October 4 at 6:40 p.m. MST, updated October 5; Ellington's denial, Richer's response and process review

About this source

The report was first published October 4 and updated October 5, although the URL contains October 6. It quotes Ellington's denial and Richer's explanation of the error.

Before the quotation

Trump and others have criticized the early release and rejected the explanation of an error.

After the quotation

Ellington also says Maricopa County was not at fault.

How this statement is classified

Denied

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is the claim that the early ballot mailing was deliberate misconduct. Ellington calls the release a "human error" and says it was "by no means intentional", which expressly rejects the claim. The closest competing label, Challenged the characterization, loses because he says the alleged intent did not exist rather than only disputing a description.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Ellington denies intentional misconduct
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/5091-ellington-acknowledges-the-mistake-and-explicitly-denies-that

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Ellington denies intentional misconduct". First published: 2026-10-07. Last updated: 2026-10-07. https://disputeindex.com/events/5091-ellington-acknowledges-the-mistake-and-explicitly-denies-that