Mosley backs carefully regulated public-safety tools and says she cannot support the resolution ending Asheville's Flock contract

Antanette MosleyVice mayor of Asheville (North Carolina), running for reelection to City Council

Mixed or conditional

At the Asheville City Council's August 25, 2026 meeting, Vice Mayor Antanette Mosley said she has concerns about Flock, including privacy, data sharing, civil liberties and accountability, and that she supports carefully regulated public-safety tools that are effective, necessary and accompanied by safeguards. She said the resolution may end a contract but does not settle the larger questions about license-plate readers, and that she could not support it in its current form. She voted no.

“I want to be clear that I have concerns about Flock. I have concerns about privacy, data sharing, civil liberties, and accountability. ... I support carefully regulated public-safety tools when they are effective, necessary, and accompanied by meaningful safeguards and accountability. ... this resolution may terminate a contract, but it does not resolve the larger issue before us. ... I cannot support this resolution in its current form tonight.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Minutes for August 25, 2026, City Council MeetingRegular Formal Meeting, 5:00 p.m., section VI (New Business), item A: Resolution 26-180, Resolution Book No. 46, Page 454. Remarks by Roney, Mosley, Smith, Turner, Hess, Ullman and Manheimer, then the 5-2 vote.

Case updates

Keep up with who wants to ban, limit or keep Flock cameras

Get an email if a candidate or official takes a new position on plate-reader networks, or if a city, legislature or court acts on them.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

Where this statement fits

Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.

Read the full case

Source and context

Original text

Minutes for August 25, 2026, City Council Meeting (opens in a new tab)Regular Formal Meeting, 5:00 p.m., section VI (New Business), item A: Resolution 26-180, Resolution Book No. 46, Page 454. Remarks by Roney, Mosley, Smith, Turner, Hess, Ullman and Manheimer, then the 5-2 vote.

About this source

Official minutes of the City of Asheville City Council meeting of August 25, 2026, posted by the city on its council minutes archive. The Flock item is New Business item A, Resolution 26-180, which directs the city manager to terminate the city's contract with Flock Safety for its 11 stationary license plate readers. The minutes quote council members in quotation marks and summarize other remarks in the clerk's words. The council approved these minutes on its September 8, 2026 consent agenda.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Earlier in the item, Mosley read part of an email from Ella Santos, chief executive officer of the Housing Authority of the City of Asheville, who wrote that residents want cameras and more security. The minutes then record 24 speakers urging the council to end the Flock contract and to pause all plate-reader use and purchases, and two speakers opposing termination.

After the quotation

Councilwoman Sheneika Smith spoke next and also said she would vote no. The resolution passed 5-2, with Mosley and Smith casting the two no votes.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. Mosley voiced concerns about Flock, said she supports carefully regulated public-safety tools that are effective and necessary, and voted against ending the contract. Backing regulated use with safeguards rather than ending it fits Mixed or conditional, and we placed it at Guardrails on the remedy ladder. The closest competing label is Defended or excused, which would fit a defense of current use; she raised concerns about Flock itself.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Jacob Burnett says Flock-style cameras should be done away with, with warrants required if they stay

Jacob Burnett

“The systems themselves can be modified to prevent nearly all abuse and be made more secure by requiring warrants for access or follow through on any data the systems collect and have all data stored on the hardware itself preventing viewing from remote locations, requiring strict login credentials and a connecting warrant number to access. These are common sense changes that if the systems are to be used I feel could correct a lot of abuse or privacy concerns but I also feel the systems should be done away with overall, especially in the realm of predictive crime analytics.”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Antanette Mosley, Mosley backs carefully regulated public-safety tools and says she cannot support the resolution ending Asheville's Flock contractDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Mosley backs carefully regulated public-safety tools and says she cannot support the resolution ending Asheville's Flock contract
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/5027-at-the-asheville-city-council-s-august-25

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Mosley backs carefully regulated public-safety tools and says she cannot support the resolution ending Asheville's Flock contract". First published: 2026-10-07. Last updated: 2026-10-07. https://disputeindex.com/events/5027-at-the-asheville-city-council-s-august-25