Sabrina Cervantes votes aye on the shock-glove ban

Sabrina CervantesCalifornia state senator

Defended or excused

The official roll call records Sabrina Cervantes's aye vote on AB 2760, which prohibits law enforcement officers, including federal officers, from using wearable electroshock devices in California.

“Recorded action: voted aye on AB 2760 on the Senate floor on August 31, 2026.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)AB 2760 vote record (committee and floor roll calls, April 14 to August 31, 2026)Votes of 08/26/26 (Senate Public Safety), 08/27/26 (Senate Appropriations), 08/31/26 (Senate floor and Assembly concurrence)

Case updates

Will California's shock-glove ban face a court test?

Expect an email if anyone sues over AB 2760, a court rules on it, or DHS, ICE or California officials take new steps on the ban.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

The California State Capitol in Sacramento seen from below, with the dome and flags against a clear blue sky.
Credit: Mackinacbridge

Where this statement fits

Can California ban ICE and other federal agents from using electric shock gloves, as AB 2760 does?

On September 29, 2026, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed AB 2760, which bars any law enforcement agency in California, including federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), from using a wearable electroshock device, meaning a weapon worn as a glove that delivers an electric shock. The law applies to state, local and federal agencies, requires a state Department of Justice study by January 1, 2029, and is repealed on January 1, 2030. It followed ICE's August 2026 sole-source contract of $16,700,640 for G.L.O.V.E. gloves from Compliant Technologies. Newsom and the bill's author, Assemblymember LaShae Sharp-Collins, defend the ban, and Sharp-Collins says the gloves have not been proven safe. First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli says California has no jurisdiction over federal agents and that he advised the Department of Homeland Security to disregard the law, and the department says it will not abide by it. Sacramento County Sheriff Jim Cooper, the California State Sheriffs' Association, Republican legislators and the gloves' maker oppose the ban as unwise, and two UC Davis law professors say California likely lacks the power to bind federal officers. The disputed question is whether California can ban federal agents from using electric shock gloves. As of October 1, 2026, no court had ruled on AB 2760, and we found no lawsuit against it.

Read the full case

Source and context

Original text

AB 2760 vote record (committee and floor roll calls, April 14 to August 31, 2026) (opens in a new tab)Votes of 08/26/26 (Senate Public Safety), 08/27/26 (Senate Appropriations), 08/31/26 (Senate floor and Assembly concurrence)

About this source

Roll calls for AB 2760. On the rewritten bill, Senate Public Safety voted 5-1 on August 26, Senate Appropriations 4-2 on August 27, the Senate floor 29-9 on August 31 and the Assembly concurred 55-16 on August 31. The earlier votes on the bill, including the Assembly's 51-7 vote on May 26, were on a different version about county inspectors general.

Before the quotation

The August 28 amendments extended the prohibition to state law enforcement agencies. The final bill also covered local and federal officers.

After the quotation

The Senate approved the bill 29-9. Governor Gavin Newsom signed it on September 29.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The aye vote records support for the bill containing the federal-agent ban. The roll call does not give Sabrina Cervantes's reasons or establish a view on the ban's constitutionality.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Sabrina Cervantes, Sabrina Cervantes votes aye on the shock-glove banDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Sabrina Cervantes votes aye on the shock-glove ban
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/4595-the-official-roll-call-records-sabrina-cervantes-s

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Sabrina Cervantes votes aye on the shock-glove ban". First published: 2026-10-05. Last updated: 2026-10-05. https://disputeindex.com/events/4595-the-official-roll-call-records-sabrina-cervantes-s