Steven Young says Flock cameras "need to be taken down immediately"

Steven YoungGreen Party candidate for governor of Minnesota, in an emailed statement

Condemned

Steven Young, the Green Party candidate for Minnesota governor, told Dispute Index by email that he is "absolutely, 100%" against Flock and Flock-style cameras, calling them an invasion of privacy that often gets things wrong and is abused by law enforcement, and said they need to be taken down immediately.

“I am absolutely, 100%, against flock and flock-style cameras. Not only are they an incredible invasion of privacy, but they also get things wrong quite often, leading to innocent people having to navigate the courts (or worse).”

Emailed statement

Read the full email
I am absolutely, 100%, against flock and flock-style cameras. Not only are they an incredible invasion of privacy, but they also get things wrong quite often, leading to innocent people having to navigate the courts (or worse). Additionally, they are abused by law enforcement who use them for stalking purposes and to arrest people merely on the pretext of a crime. They are a part of our surveillance state's apparatus, and need to be taken down immediately.
Emailed statement from Steven Young to Dispute Index on license plate readersEmailed statement from Steven Young, October 1, 2026.

Case updates

Keep up with who wants to ban, limit or keep Flock cameras

Get an email if a candidate or official takes a new position on plate-reader networks, or if a city, legislature or court acts on them.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

Where this statement fits

Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.

Read the full case

Source and context

Emailed statement

Emailed statement from Steven Young to Dispute Index on license plate readers
I am absolutely, 100%, against flock and flock-style cameras. Not only are they an incredible invasion of privacy, but they also get things wrong quite often, leading to innocent people having to navigate the courts (or worse). Additionally, they are abused by law enforcement who use them for stalking purposes and to arrest people merely on the pretext of a crime. They are a part of our surveillance state's apparatus, and need to be taken down immediately.
Emailed statement from Steven Young, October 1, 2026.

About this source

Young sent this statement, signed "Steve," by email from the [email protected] address listed on his campaign website, in reply to a Dispute Index request about license plate readers. The link is to his campaign website; the statement itself is not published there. The text is reproduced as sent.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Dispute Index asked Young where he stands on Flock-style license plate cameras. He replied by email from his campaign address.

After the quotation

Young added that the cameras "are abused by law enforcement who use them for stalking purposes and to arrest people merely on the pretext of a crime," and said, "They are a part of our surveillance state's apparatus, and need to be taken down immediately."

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. Young says he is completely against the cameras and that they need to be taken down immediately, which rejects the networks outright, so we labeled it Condemned with the Ban or remove step.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Jacob Burnett says Flock-style cameras should be done away with, with warrants required if they stay

Jacob Burnett

“The systems themselves can be modified to prevent nearly all abuse and be made more secure by requiring warrants for access or follow through on any data the systems collect and have all data stored on the hardware itself preventing viewing from remote locations, requiring strict login credentials and a connecting warrant number to access. These are common sense changes that if the systems are to be used I feel could correct a lot of abuse or privacy concerns but I also feel the systems should be done away with overall, especially in the realm of predictive crime analytics.”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Steven Young, Steven Young says Flock cameras "need to be taken down immediately"Download image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Steven Young says Flock cameras "need to be taken down immediately"
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/3993-steven-young-the-green-party-candidate-for-minnesota

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Steven Young says Flock cameras "need to be taken down immediately"". First published: 2026-10-01. Last updated: 2026-10-01. https://disputeindex.com/events/3993-steven-young-the-green-party-candidate-for-minnesota