Ahlers supported community decisions on reader installation

Dan AhlersSouth Dakota Democratic gubernatorial candidate

Mixed or conditional

Ahlers said communities should decide whether readers are installed in their neighborhoods.

“I think people in their communities should have a say in whether or not they want these in their neighborhoods,”

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)Ahlers supports community decisions on readersOpening Ahlers quotation, attributed to September 17 forum

Case updates

Keep up with who wants to ban, limit or keep Flock cameras

Get an email if a candidate or official takes a new position on plate-reader networks, or if a city, legislature or court acts on them.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

Where this statement fits

Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.

Read the full case

Source and context

Reporting

Ahlers supports community decisions on readers (opens in a new tab)Opening Ahlers quotation, attributed to September 17 forum

About this source

Original forum reporting reproduced by Northern Plains News.

Before the quotation

Ahlers spoke at a Northern State University Democrats candidate forum on September 17.

After the quotation

He urged residents to follow local camera-contract decisions. The report discussed other officials' data restrictions separately.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Relative to continued networked reader use, Ahlers makes deployment subject to community choice. This is a general local-control position, rather than a statewide prohibition.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Jacob Burnett says Flock-style cameras should be done away with, with warrants required if they stay

Jacob Burnett

“The systems themselves can be modified to prevent nearly all abuse and be made more secure by requiring warrants for access or follow through on any data the systems collect and have all data stored on the hardware itself preventing viewing from remote locations, requiring strict login credentials and a connecting warrant number to access. These are common sense changes that if the systems are to be used I feel could correct a lot of abuse or privacy concerns but I also feel the systems should be done away with overall, especially in the realm of predictive crime analytics.”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Dan Ahlers, Ahlers supported community decisions on reader installationDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Ahlers supported community decisions on reader installation
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/3630-ahlers-said-communities-should-decide-whether-readers-are

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Ahlers supported community decisions on reader installation". First published: 2026-09-30. Last updated: 2026-09-30. https://disputeindex.com/events/3630-ahlers-said-communities-should-decide-whether-readers-are