Polis's office said he supported statutory rules for readers but opposed Senate Bill 26-070 because of its effect on public safety.

Jared PolisColorado governor, through an official statement from his office

Mixed or conditional

Polis's office said he supported statutory rules for readers but opposed Senate Bill 26-070 because of its effect on public safety.

“Governor Polis has consistently said that he would support codifying best practices into law as it relates to license plate readers.”

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)Colorado governor's office explains opposition to Senate Bill 26-070Governor quotation and surrounding reader-policy discussion

Case updates

Keep up with who wants to ban, limit or keep Flock cameras

Get an email if a candidate or official takes a new position on plate-reader networks, or if a city, legislature or court acts on them.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

Where this statement fits

Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.

Read the full case

Source and context

Reporting

Colorado governor's office explains opposition to Senate Bill 26-070 (opens in a new tab)Governor quotation and surrounding reader-policy discussion

About this source

Boulder Reporting Lab published the governor's office statement on April 30, 2026, after the bill's sponsor withdrew it.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Boulder Reporting Lab published the governor's office statement on April 30, 2026, after the bill's sponsor withdrew it.

After the quotation

The office said the bill exceeded the rules Polis would support. The statement did not endorse the bill's specific warrant or data restrictions.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The official statement supports continued police use and codified practices while opposing the proposed bill. This is a qualified position with a general safeguards remedy.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Flock Safety

More from this case

Read the full case

Jacob Burnett says Flock-style cameras should be done away with, with warrants required if they stay

Jacob Burnett

“The systems themselves can be modified to prevent nearly all abuse and be made more secure by requiring warrants for access or follow through on any data the systems collect and have all data stored on the hardware itself preventing viewing from remote locations, requiring strict login credentials and a connecting warrant number to access. These are common sense changes that if the systems are to be used I feel could correct a lot of abuse or privacy concerns but I also feel the systems should be done away with overall, especially in the realm of predictive crime analytics.”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Jared Polis, Polis's office said he supported statutory rules for readers but opposed Senate Bill 26-070 because of its effect on public safety.Download image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Polis's office said he supported statutory rules for readers but opposed Senate Bill 26-070 because of its effect on public safety.
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/3577-polis-s-office-said-he-supported-statutory-rules

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Polis's office said he supported statutory rules for readers but opposed Senate Bill 26-070 because of its effect on public safety.". First published: 2026-09-30. Last updated: 2026-09-30. https://disputeindex.com/events/3577-polis-s-office-said-he-supported-statutory-rules