Wilson defended law enforcement access to ALPRs and joined legal briefs opposing privacy challenges to the technology.
Alan WilsonSouth Carolina attorney general and candidate for governor
Wilson defended law enforcement access to ALPRs and joined legal briefs opposing privacy challenges to the technology.
“Removing these license plate readers would make everyone less safe.”
Official statement
Other statements by Alan Wilson in this case
Every statement by Alan Wilson
Where this statement fits
Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.
Source and context
Official statement
About this source
Wilson's office announced participation in two multistate coalitions defending automatic license plate readers.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
Wilson's office announced participation in two multistate coalitions defending automatic license plate readers.
After the quotation
The announcement cited constitutional arguments about visible plates and investigative value. Wilson expressly opposed removing the readers.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
Relative to networked ALPR surveillance, Wilson argues that continued access is justified and that removing the tools harms safety.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseJacob Burnett says Flock-style cameras should be done away with, with warrants required if they stay
“The systems themselves can be modified to prevent nearly all abuse and be made more secure by requiring warrants for access or follow through on any data the systems collect and have all data stored on the hardware itself preventing viewing from remote locations, requiring strict login credentials and a connecting warrant number to access. These are common sense changes that if the systems are to be used I feel could correct a lot of abuse or privacy concerns but I also feel the systems should be done away with overall, especially in the realm of predictive crime analytics.”Read statement
Dean Brewer, an independent candidate for Tennessee governor, says Flock cameras should be banned
“I believe flock cameras should be banned.”Read statement
Buddy Carter says license plate cameras help investigators but need privacy safeguards
“Technologies like license plate recognition cameras can provide valuable investigative tools, but they have also raised important questions about privacy and government oversight. As these systems become more common, it is important to balance public safety with appropriate safeguards that protect individual privacy.”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Wilson defended law enforcement access to ALPRs and joined legal briefs opposing privacy challenges to the technology.
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/3544-wilson-defended-law-enforcement-access-to-alprs-and
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Wilson defended law enforcement access to ALPRs and joined legal briefs opposing privacy challenges to the technology.". First published: 2026-09-30. Last updated: 2026-09-30. https://disputeindex.com/events/3544-wilson-defended-law-enforcement-access-to-alprs-and