Block said he opposed ongoing Flock use in Rhode Island and called for strong state regulation if the cameras remain.

Ken Block2026 candidate for governor of Rhode Island

Block said he opposed ongoing Flock use in Rhode Island and called for strong state regulation if the cameras remain.

“If we're going to have them, they should be strongly regulated by our state”

Original video

Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)Block opposes Flock use and calls for strong regulation if it continuesFull interview transcript, question Do you support the ongoing use of flock automated license plate readers in Rhode Island?
A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

Where this statement fits

Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.

Read the full case

Case updates

Keep up with who wants to ban, limit or keep Flock cameras

Get an email if a candidate or official takes a new position on plate-reader networks, or if a city, legislature or court acts on them.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original video

Block opposes Flock use and calls for strong regulation if it continues (opens in a new tab)Full interview transcript, question Do you support the ongoing use of flock automated license plate readers in Rhode Island?

About this source

Ian Donnis asked Block whether he supported ongoing use of Flock license plate readers.

Ken Block answers a question about Flock license plate readers, from "One on One with Ian Donnis," Sept. 18, 2026.

Excerpt from 20:12 to 21:14 of the Rhode Island PBS video. DI added its logo in the corner.

Video: Rhode Island PBS. Excerpt used for news reporting and commentary

Watch the full original video (opens in a new tab) (relevant passage: Full interview transcript, question Do you support the ongoing use of flock automated license plate readers in Rhode Island?)

Before the quotation

Ian Donnis asked Block whether he supported ongoing use of Flock license plate readers.

After the quotation

Block cited misuse risks and government intrusion. He offered regulation as a fallback if the cameras continue.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Relative to networked ALPR surveillance, Block combines opposition with a conditional regulatory alternative. The tracker places alternatives on the milder remedy he supports.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Flock Safety

More from this case

Read the full case

Gluba says Flock and other license plate cameras violate the Fourth Amendment and should be removed

Nicholas Gluba

“They are a complete violation of community privacy and safety, they are in direct violation of the fourth amendment to the US constitution and should by law be removed immediately. They have been abused throughout the country by various LEOs and citizens alike as they have little to no security in their software. Every other day we see a new article about someone using a LPR camera system to spy on and track an ex girlfriend or boyfriend, or we see that someone has again used them to track children. They must be removed!”
Read statement

Brandenburg opposes Flock-style camera networks in Michigan

Donna Brandenburg

“I, Donna Brandenburg, oppose Flock and all 3rd party - Flock-style license plate camera networks in Michigan. Tracking the movements of law-abiding citizens without a warrant is an unreasonable search under the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and Article 1, Section 11 of the Michigan Constitution, which expressly protects 'electronic data and electronic communications.' As governor, I would end state participation in these surveillance networks, require a warrant based on probable cause before any data is collected or accessed, and order existing data on innocent drivers destroyed.”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Ken Block, Block said he opposed ongoing Flock use in Rhode Island and called for strong state regulation if the cameras remain.Download image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Block said he opposed ongoing Flock use in Rhode Island and called for strong state regulation if the cameras remain.
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/3543-block-said-he-opposed-ongoing-flock-use-in

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Block said he opposed ongoing Flock use in Rhode Island and called for strong state regulation if the cameras remain.". First published: 2026-09-30. Last updated: 2026-09-30. https://disputeindex.com/events/3543-block-said-he-opposed-ongoing-flock-use-in