Haaland supported enforceable privacy rules in response to a questionnaire that addressed surveillance technologies and ALPR protections.

Deb Haaland2026 candidate for governor of New Mexico

Mixed or conditional

Haaland supported enforceable privacy rules in response to a questionnaire that addressed surveillance technologies and ALPR protections.

“Yes. New Mexico needs clear, enforceable guardrails for surveillance technology.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Haaland supports enforceable surveillance safeguardsDeb Haaland's answer to the surveillance question

Case updates

Keep up with who wants to ban, limit or keep Flock cameras

Get an email if a candidate or official takes a new position on plate-reader networks, or if a city, legislature or court acts on them.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

Where this statement fits

Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.

Read the full case

Source and context

Original text

Haaland supports enforceable surveillance safeguards (opens in a new tab)Deb Haaland's answer to the surveillance question

About this source

An undated ACLU of New Mexico questionnaire available on September 30 asked candidates about surveillance safeguards, including ALPRs.

Before the quotation

An undated ACLU of New Mexico questionnaire available on September 30 asked candidates about surveillance safeguards, including ALPRs.

After the quotation

Haaland called for constitutional protections, transparency and accountability. Her answer addressed surveillance broadly.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Relative to networked ALPR surveillance, Haaland supports privacy conditions in an answer to a question that expressly includes ALPRs.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Jacob Burnett says Flock-style cameras should be done away with, with warrants required if they stay

Jacob Burnett

“The systems themselves can be modified to prevent nearly all abuse and be made more secure by requiring warrants for access or follow through on any data the systems collect and have all data stored on the hardware itself preventing viewing from remote locations, requiring strict login credentials and a connecting warrant number to access. These are common sense changes that if the systems are to be used I feel could correct a lot of abuse or privacy concerns but I also feel the systems should be done away with overall, especially in the realm of predictive crime analytics.”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Deb Haaland, Haaland supported enforceable privacy rules in response to a questionnaire that addressed surveillance technologies and ALPR protections.Download image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Haaland supported enforceable privacy rules in response to a questionnaire that addressed surveillance technologies and ALPR protections.
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/3538-haaland-supported-enforceable-privacy-rules-in-response-to

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Haaland supported enforceable privacy rules in response to a questionnaire that addressed surveillance technologies and ALPR protections.". First published: 2026-09-30. Last updated: 2026-09-30. https://disputeindex.com/events/3538-haaland-supported-enforceable-privacy-rules-in-response-to