Lamont urged Connecticut municipalities to pause new camera and ALPR installations until state guidance on privacy and data use was ready.
Ned LamontConnecticut governor
Lamont urged Connecticut municipalities to pause new camera and ALPR installations until state guidance on privacy and data use was ready.
“we must have clear policies in place regarding what is happening with this data, who has access to it, and how it can be used”
Official statement
Where this statement fits
Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.
Source and context
Official statement
About this source
Lamont requested a review by the state police standards and training council.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
Lamont requested a review by the state police standards and training council.
After the quotation
He asked for guidance within 30 days and recognized a public safety purpose for the equipment. The pause concerns new installations.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
Relative to networked ALPR surveillance, Lamont conditions further installations on clear rules. His requested remedy is an installation pause pending guidance.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseJacob Burnett says Flock-style cameras should be done away with, with warrants required if they stay
“The systems themselves can be modified to prevent nearly all abuse and be made more secure by requiring warrants for access or follow through on any data the systems collect and have all data stored on the hardware itself preventing viewing from remote locations, requiring strict login credentials and a connecting warrant number to access. These are common sense changes that if the systems are to be used I feel could correct a lot of abuse or privacy concerns but I also feel the systems should be done away with overall, especially in the realm of predictive crime analytics.”Read statement
Dean Brewer, an independent candidate for Tennessee governor, says Flock cameras should be banned
“I believe flock cameras should be banned.”Read statement
Buddy Carter says license plate cameras help investigators but need privacy safeguards
“Technologies like license plate recognition cameras can provide valuable investigative tools, but they have also raised important questions about privacy and government oversight. As these systems become more common, it is important to balance public safety with appropriate safeguards that protect individual privacy.”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Lamont urged Connecticut municipalities to pause new camera and ALPR installations until state guidance on privacy and data use was ready.
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/3531-lamont-urged-connecticut-municipalities-to-pause-new-camera
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Lamont urged Connecticut municipalities to pause new camera and ALPR installations until state guidance on privacy and data use was ready.". First published: 2026-09-30. Last updated: 2026-09-30. https://disputeindex.com/events/3531-lamont-urged-connecticut-municipalities-to-pause-new-camera