Kehoe backed continued ALPR use with limits on retention, access and sharing

Mike KehoeMissouri governor

Mixed or conditional

Kehoe backed continued ALPR use with limits on retention, access and sharing. His order applies to state agencies and local systems supported by state funds.

“Protecting citizens also means protecting their constitutional rights”

Official statement

Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Kehoe announces ALPR safeguards in Executive Order 26-18Governor's quotation and scope of Executive Order 26-18

Case updates

Keep up with who wants to ban, limit or keep Flock cameras

Get an email if a candidate or official takes a new position on plate-reader networks, or if a city, legislature or court acts on them.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

Where this statement fits

Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.

Read the full case

Source and context

Official statement

Kehoe announces ALPR safeguards in Executive Order 26-18 (opens in a new tab)Governor's quotation and scope of Executive Order 26-18

About this source

Kehoe announced Executive Order 26-18 on automated license plate readers.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Kehoe announced Executive Order 26-18 on automated license plate readers.

After the quotation

The order requires deletion of most data within 30 days, bars commercial use by vendors and restricts purposes. Other local agencies are encouraged to adopt the rules.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Relative to continued networked ALPR surveillance, Kehoe supports use subject to concrete privacy limits. These conditions materially qualify his support.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Flock Safety

More from this case

Read the full case

Jacob Burnett says Flock-style cameras should be done away with, with warrants required if they stay

Jacob Burnett

“The systems themselves can be modified to prevent nearly all abuse and be made more secure by requiring warrants for access or follow through on any data the systems collect and have all data stored on the hardware itself preventing viewing from remote locations, requiring strict login credentials and a connecting warrant number to access. These are common sense changes that if the systems are to be used I feel could correct a lot of abuse or privacy concerns but I also feel the systems should be done away with overall, especially in the realm of predictive crime analytics.”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Mike Kehoe, Kehoe backed continued ALPR use with limits on retention, access and sharingDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Kehoe backed continued ALPR use with limits on retention, access and sharing
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/3528-kehoe-backed-continued-alpr-use-with-limits-on

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Kehoe backed continued ALPR use with limits on retention, access and sharing". First published: 2026-09-30. Last updated: 2026-09-30. https://disputeindex.com/events/3528-kehoe-backed-continued-alpr-use-with-limits-on