Crenshaw calls Flock cameras powerful but raises a concern

Dan CrenshawU.S. representative from Texas

Mixed or conditional

Representative Dan Crenshaw called Flock cameras a powerful law enforcement tool and said he has one major concern about where they could lead.

“Flock cameras are a powerful law enforcement tool – but I have one major concern about where they could lead us.”

Original post

Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Rep. Dan Crenshaw post on Flock camerasPost on X, September 25, 2026
A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

Where this statement fits

Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.

Read the full case

Case updates

Keep up with who wants to ban, limit or keep Flock cameras

Get an email if a candidate or official takes a new position on plate-reader networks, or if a city, legislature or court acts on them.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original post

Rep. Dan Crenshaw post on Flock cameras (opens in a new tab)Post on X, September 25, 2026

About this source

Post from Rep. Dan Crenshaw's official X account describing Flock cameras as a powerful law enforcement tool and raising a concern.

Before the quotation

Crenshaw posted the remark on X about Flock cameras.

After the quotation

The quoted post states no remedy.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Crenshaw praises the cameras as a tool and raises a concern without naming a remedy in the quoted post.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Jacob Burnett says Flock-style cameras should be done away with, with warrants required if they stay

Jacob Burnett

“The systems themselves can be modified to prevent nearly all abuse and be made more secure by requiring warrants for access or follow through on any data the systems collect and have all data stored on the hardware itself preventing viewing from remote locations, requiring strict login credentials and a connecting warrant number to access. These are common sense changes that if the systems are to be used I feel could correct a lot of abuse or privacy concerns but I also feel the systems should be done away with overall, especially in the realm of predictive crime analytics.”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Dan Crenshaw, Crenshaw calls Flock cameras powerful but raises a concernDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Crenshaw calls Flock cameras powerful but raises a concern
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/3524-representative-dan-crenshaw-called-flock-cameras-a-powerful

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Crenshaw calls Flock cameras powerful but raises a concern". First published: 2026-09-30. Last updated: 2026-09-30. https://disputeindex.com/events/3524-representative-dan-crenshaw-called-flock-cameras-a-powerful