Jordan wants safeguards on Flock cameras, local or federal

Jim JordanU.S. representative from Ohio

Mixed or conditional

Representative Jim Jordan said safeguards are needed on Flock cameras, at the local or federal level.

“I think we need to put some safeguards in place. I really do. Whether that's at local level or if there's something that we need to do at the federal level.”

Interview

Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)Jim Jordan on Flock cameras, safeguards and privacy concerns, NewsNationInterview segment on Flock cameras and safeguards

Case updates

Keep up with who wants to ban, limit or keep Flock cameras

Get an email if a candidate or official takes a new position on plate-reader networks, or if a city, legislature or court acts on them.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

Where this statement fits

Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.

Read the full case

Source and context

Interview

Jim Jordan on Flock cameras, safeguards and privacy concerns, NewsNation (opens in a new tab)Interview segment on Flock cameras and safeguards

About this source

NewsNation interview with Rep. Jim Jordan on privacy concerns about Flock cameras.

Before the quotation

Jordan was asked about Flock cameras and privacy concerns on NewsNation's On Balance with Leland Vittert.

After the quotation

He left open whether local governments or Congress should set the safeguards.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Jordan calls for safeguards without proposing a ban or a funding cut, and he leaves open which level of government should set them.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Jacob Burnett says Flock-style cameras should be done away with, with warrants required if they stay

Jacob Burnett

“The systems themselves can be modified to prevent nearly all abuse and be made more secure by requiring warrants for access or follow through on any data the systems collect and have all data stored on the hardware itself preventing viewing from remote locations, requiring strict login credentials and a connecting warrant number to access. These are common sense changes that if the systems are to be used I feel could correct a lot of abuse or privacy concerns but I also feel the systems should be done away with overall, especially in the realm of predictive crime analytics.”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Jim Jordan, Jordan wants safeguards on Flock cameras, local or federalDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Jordan wants safeguards on Flock cameras, local or federal
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/3519-representative-jim-jordan-said-safeguards-are-needed-on

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Jordan wants safeguards on Flock cameras, local or federal". First published: 2026-09-30. Last updated: 2026-09-30. https://disputeindex.com/events/3519-representative-jim-jordan-said-safeguards-are-needed-on