Padilla calls Flock misreads alarming and asks for strong safeguards
Alex PadillaU.S. senator from California, in a statement to Business Insider
Padilla said misreads from law enforcement use of license-plate cameras are deeply alarming, as are the mass surveillance capabilities they enable. He said technologies like Flock should only be deployed with strong safeguards that protect public safety and constitutional rights.
“inaccuracies stemming from law enforcement's use of this technology are deeply alarming, as are the mass surveillance capabilities that it enables.”
Interview
Where this statement fits
Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.
Source and context
Interview
About this source
Business Insider reported that Flock misread plates in 71 percent of alerts sent to Roseville police in 2023 and 2024. Padilla gave the quoted statement to the outlet for the story. The statement's delivery date is not given; the record uses the publication date.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
Business Insider reported that Flock's software misread plates in 71 percent of the 1,427 alerts it sent Roseville police in 2023 and 2024, and that none of the incorrect alerts led to a stop or arrest because officers verify first. The story closes with reaction from Padilla.
After the quotation
Technologies like Flock, he said, "should only be deployed with strong safeguards that protect both public safety and Americans' constitutional rights."
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. Padilla criticized misreads and mass surveillance capability while saying the technology should only be deployed with strong safeguards. Supporting continued use with safeguards fits Mixed or conditional, and his remedy is general guardrails rather than a warrant rule, funding cut or ban.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseJacob Burnett says Flock-style cameras should be done away with, with warrants required if they stay
“The systems themselves can be modified to prevent nearly all abuse and be made more secure by requiring warrants for access or follow through on any data the systems collect and have all data stored on the hardware itself preventing viewing from remote locations, requiring strict login credentials and a connecting warrant number to access. These are common sense changes that if the systems are to be used I feel could correct a lot of abuse or privacy concerns but I also feel the systems should be done away with overall, especially in the realm of predictive crime analytics.”Read statement
Dean Brewer, an independent candidate for Tennessee governor, says Flock cameras should be banned
“I believe flock cameras should be banned.”Read statement
Buddy Carter says license plate cameras help investigators but need privacy safeguards
“Technologies like license plate recognition cameras can provide valuable investigative tools, but they have also raised important questions about privacy and government oversight. As these systems become more common, it is important to balance public safety with appropriate safeguards that protect individual privacy.”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Padilla calls Flock misreads alarming and asks for strong safeguards
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/3508-padilla-said-misreads-from-law-enforcement-use-of
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Padilla calls Flock misreads alarming and asks for strong safeguards". First published: 2026-09-30. Last updated: 2026-09-30. https://disputeindex.com/events/3508-padilla-said-misreads-from-law-enforcement-use-of