Aaron Jones calls for new legal limits on Flock and AI surveillance
Democratic candidate for Ohio House District 88
“I’ve got a pretty simple view on this: if you haven’t done anything wrong, the government shouldn’t be keeping tabs on everywhere you go, Flock is one example, but AI-powered surveillance is spreading fast, and the law needs to catch up,”
Source and context
Reporting
About this source
TiffinOhio.net report on a campaign statement by Ohio House District 88 candidate Aaron Jones about Flock cameras and AI surveillance.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
TiffinOhio.net reported that Jones, challenging Republican Rep. Gary Click in House District 88, called for new limits on government use of Flock cameras and other AI-powered surveillance in a campaign statement.
After the quotation
Jones said he would work with both parties to introduce legislation protecting Ohioans from mass surveillance. TiffinOhio.net reported he had not released bill language saying whether it would resemble a broad prohibition or a regulatory approach.
How this statement is classified
Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference point is whether networked license-plate cameras such as Flock should exist and be used. Jones says the government should not track where law-abiding people go and pledges legislation to limit surveillance, but TiffinOhio.net reports he has not said whether that would ban the cameras or regulate them. An unresolved choice between limits and a ban is Mixed or conditional.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Flock Safety
Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”Read statement
“Tennesseans should be free from a surveillance state.”Read statement
“We need to restore real limits, real oversight, and real due process.”Read statement