Aaron Jones calls for new legal limits on Flock and AI surveillance
Aaron JonesDemocratic candidate for Ohio House District 88
Aaron Jones said the government should not keep tabs on everywhere law-abiding people go and that the law needs to catch up with Flock and other AI-powered surveillance.
“I’ve got a pretty simple view on this: if you haven’t done anything wrong, the government shouldn’t be keeping tabs on everywhere you go, Flock is one example, but AI-powered surveillance is spreading fast, and the law needs to catch up,”
Reporting
Where this statement fits
Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.
Source and context
Reporting
About this source
TiffinOhio.net report on a campaign statement by Ohio House District 88 candidate Aaron Jones about Flock cameras and AI surveillance.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
TiffinOhio.net reported that Jones, challenging Republican Rep. Gary Click in House District 88, called for new limits on government use of Flock cameras and other AI-powered surveillance in a campaign statement.
After the quotation
Jones said he would work with both parties to introduce legislation protecting Ohioans from mass surveillance. TiffinOhio.net reported he had not released bill language saying whether it would resemble a broad prohibition or a regulatory approach.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference point is whether networked license-plate cameras such as Flock should exist and be used. Jones says the government should not track where law-abiding people go and pledges legislation to limit surveillance, but TiffinOhio.net reports he has not said whether that would ban the cameras or regulate them. An unresolved choice between limits and a ban is Mixed or conditional.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Flock Safety
More from this case
Read the full caseStegner campaign platform supports warrants for Flock data access
“The mass surveillance and warrantless tracking enabled by Flock cameras raises serious and legitimate concerns.”Read statement
Janoo campaign platform calls for a Flock camera ban
“Protect Vermonters from mass surveillance by prohibiting the sale of sensitive personal information, banning surveillance technologies such as Flock cameras”Read statement
Kreiss-Tomkins proposes a statewide ban on Flock cameras
“Protect Alaskans' privacy by issuing a statewide ban on Flock cameras and similar AI-driven mass-surveillance technology.”Read statement
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Aaron Jones calls for new legal limits on Flock and AI surveillance
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/3191-aaron-jones-said-the-government-should-not-keep
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Aaron Jones calls for new legal limits on Flock and AI surveillance". First published: 2026-09-29. Last updated: 2026-09-29. https://disputeindex.com/events/3191-aaron-jones-said-the-government-should-not-keep