Leko ties any future license-plate readers to safeguards and public support
Dakota County sheriff running for reelection
“I support the responsible use of this technology when proper controls, accountability, demonstrated value and public support are in place. However, technology must also maintain public trust and provide sufficient value. As concerns grew regarding data privacy and the broader sharing of license plate reader information, I listened. We also evaluated the return from cameras located in our rural patrol area. Considering both public concerns and the limited return in those locations, we ended our ALPR pilot program on September 3, 2026.”
Source and context
Interview
About this source
West St. Paul Reader questionnaire in which both Dakota County sheriff candidates answered the same written questions, including one on Flock cameras.
Before the quotation
The West St. Paul Reader asked both sheriff candidates whether they support the continued use of Flock cameras in Dakota County. Leko wrote that his office placed eight license-plate reader cameras in its rural patrol area in a pilot beginning in spring 2025.
After the quotation
Leko wrote that he will continue evaluating technology and, before reconsidering license-plate readers, will involve the public and ensure safeguards, community support and public trust are in place.
How this statement is classified
Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference point is whether networked license-plate readers such as Flock should exist and be used. Leko says he supports responsible use when controls, accountability, demonstrated value and public support are in place, while explaining that his office ended its pilot and would involve the public before reconsidering. Support tied to those conditions is Mixed or conditional.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Flock Safety
Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”Read statement
“Tennesseans should be free from a surveillance state.”Read statement
“We need to restore real limits, real oversight, and real due process.”Read statement