Paul Kerfeld backs police use of Flock cameras
Paul KerfeldCandidate for Folsom City Council, District 1
Paul Kerfeld said Flock cameras do not need a salary, benefits or a pension and help law enforcement in Folsom and across the region.
“Flock cameras do not need a salary, health benefits, or a pension, It's a way to help law enforcement not only in Folsom but region-wide, county-wide, into El Dorado County.”
Reporting
Where this statement fits
Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.
Source and context
Reporting
About this source
The Sacramento Bee report on where the three Folsom City Council District 1 candidates stand on automated license plate readers and Flock cameras.
Before the quotation
At a Sept. 14 League of Women Voters forum, Kerfeld said he wanted police to have access to the cameras and described them as a low-cost tool that lets local police work with other agencies, The Sacramento Bee reported.
After the quotation
He said anyone who misused data from the cameras should be "imprisoned" and that people who were not breaking the law should not be concerned about the surveillance.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. Kerfeld described Flock cameras as a low-cost tool that helps law enforcement across the region and said he wanted police to have access to them. That supports keeping the cameras, which fits Defended or excused; his call to imprison anyone who misuses the data does not add a limit on their use.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Flock Safety
More from this case
Read the full caseJacob Burnett says Flock-style cameras should be done away with, with warrants required if they stay
“The systems themselves can be modified to prevent nearly all abuse and be made more secure by requiring warrants for access or follow through on any data the systems collect and have all data stored on the hardware itself preventing viewing from remote locations, requiring strict login credentials and a connecting warrant number to access. These are common sense changes that if the systems are to be used I feel could correct a lot of abuse or privacy concerns but I also feel the systems should be done away with overall, especially in the realm of predictive crime analytics.”Read statement
Dean Brewer, an independent candidate for Tennessee governor, says Flock cameras should be banned
“I believe flock cameras should be banned.”Read statement
Buddy Carter says license plate cameras help investigators but need privacy safeguards
“Technologies like license plate recognition cameras can provide valuable investigative tools, but they have also raised important questions about privacy and government oversight. As these systems become more common, it is important to balance public safety with appropriate safeguards that protect individual privacy.”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Paul Kerfeld backs police use of Flock cameras
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/3184-paul-kerfeld-said-flock-cameras-do-not-need
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Paul Kerfeld backs police use of Flock cameras". First published: 2026-09-29. Last updated: 2026-09-29. https://disputeindex.com/events/3184-paul-kerfeld-said-flock-cameras-do-not-need