Tony Teixeira would vote again for Bristol's Flock camera
Bristol town councilor (I) running for reelection
“I voted in favor, and I would do it again. As my colleague Nathan Calouro already mentioned, “How many of us have children? How many of us have family members that have dementia and so forth?” If they leave your house, you cannot find them, and they are abducted, or they get into a situation where they get injured, hurt, or killed, does the police department have the tools that they need to pursue or do the search? We’re missing that. We approved one camera at the bridge, not in town. There’s a big difference between having an eye on you versus an eye on the bridge, which keeps the flow and can assist, whether it’s the local or the state police. So I support that, although it was already mentioned, we set parameters. We didn’t just approve it outright.”
Source and context
Original text
About this source
Steve Ahlquist published a transcript, edited for clarity, and video of the Bristol Town Council candidate forum sponsored by the League of Women Voters of Rhode Island and the East Bay Media Group at the Bristol State House.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
At a Bristol Town Council candidate forum on Sept. 24, 2026, sponsored by the League of Women Voters of Rhode Island and the East Bay Media Group, candidates answered questions about the council's approval of one Rhode Island State Police Flock camera. Remarks are as transcribed, and edited for clarity, by Steve Ahlquist.
After the quotation
Councilor Mary Parella then said Bristol put guardrails in place before approving the camera and that the approval sunsets in 18 months.
How this statement is classified
Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. Teixeira says he voted for the camera and would do it again, citing searches for missing or abducted people. He notes the council set parameters, but his support does not depend on a further condition, so Defended or excused fits.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Flock Safety
Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”Read statement
“Tennesseans should be free from a surveillance state.”Read statement
“We need to restore real limits, real oversight, and real due process.”Read statement