House backs Flagstaff's cancellation of its Flock contract
Khara HouseFlagstaff City Council member running for reelection
Flagstaff City Council member Khara House said she is proud of the council's unanimous decision to cancel the city's Flock contract, and that conversations with residents, advocacy groups, the ACLU and the Policing Project at NYU Law made clear there were issues with Flock.
“I’m proud of Council’s unanimous decision to cancel the City’s Flock contract. Before our decision, I engaged in extensive conversations with community members, advocacy organizations, the ACLU, and The Policing Project at NYU Law to better understand the privacy, civil liberties, data-sharing, and public safety implications of this technology. While the community expressed trust in and support for Flagstaff’s police department, it was also clear that there were issues with Flock. Since our cancellation, I’ve watched other Arizona communities follow our lead in cancelling their own Flock agreements.”
Reporting
Where this statement fits
Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.
Source and context
Reporting
About this source
Arizona Daily Sun feature in its 2026 candidate question series, printing the written answers of Flagstaff City Council and mayoral candidates to a question about Flock cameras. The paper says the answers were limited to 150 words and printed unedited unless a candidate went over that limit.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
The Arizona Daily Sun asked the Flagstaff City Council and mayoral candidates on the November ballot where they stood on Flock cameras and their potential use in Flagstaff. The paper printed their written answers, limited to 150 words and unedited unless a candidate exceeded that limit.
After the quotation
House added that Flagstaff Police had set up a technology privacy task force and committed to broader public engagement on future technology. She said she wants the city investing in approaches that build community trust and protect civil liberties.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. House, who voted with the council to cancel the city's Flock contract, wrote that she is proud of that decision and pointed to other Arizona communities cancelling their own agreements. She endorses ending the network in Flagstaff and does not propose keeping it with limits, so Condemned fits.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Flock Safety
More from this case
Read the full caseJacob Burnett says Flock-style cameras should be done away with, with warrants required if they stay
“The systems themselves can be modified to prevent nearly all abuse and be made more secure by requiring warrants for access or follow through on any data the systems collect and have all data stored on the hardware itself preventing viewing from remote locations, requiring strict login credentials and a connecting warrant number to access. These are common sense changes that if the systems are to be used I feel could correct a lot of abuse or privacy concerns but I also feel the systems should be done away with overall, especially in the realm of predictive crime analytics.”Read statement
Dean Brewer, an independent candidate for Tennessee governor, says Flock cameras should be banned
“I believe flock cameras should be banned.”Read statement
Buddy Carter says license plate cameras help investigators but need privacy safeguards
“Technologies like license plate recognition cameras can provide valuable investigative tools, but they have also raised important questions about privacy and government oversight. As these systems become more common, it is important to balance public safety with appropriate safeguards that protect individual privacy.”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- House backs Flagstaff's cancellation of its Flock contract
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/3143-flagstaff-city-council-member-khara-house-said-she
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "House backs Flagstaff's cancellation of its Flock contract". First published: 2026-09-29. Last updated: 2026-09-29. https://disputeindex.com/events/3143-flagstaff-city-council-member-khara-house-said-she