Baca says Flagstaff must balance new technology for first responders with privacy and data limits

Nancy BacaCandidate for Flagstaff City Council

Mixed or conditional

Nancy Baca said the debate over Flock did not end with the council's decision not to renew the contract, and that the city must evaluate emerging technologies for first responders while considering how long data is kept and who can access it.

“While the sitting council already made its decision regarding the nonrenewal of the Flock contract, the conversation is far from over. This is not the last time our community will be faced with balancing technology and privacy while also providing support to our first responders. Departments remain understaffed and we must evaluate emerging technologies that can help increase the safety of responders and citizens alike. As we move forward, we must also be thoughtful about privacy, how long data is retained and who has access to it.”

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)Election 2026 - Candidate Question #8: Where do you stand on Flock cameras?Candidate answers under the Council and Mayor headings of the article

Case updates

Keep up with who wants to ban, limit or keep Flock cameras

Get an email if a candidate or official takes a new position on plate-reader networks, or if a city, legislature or court acts on them.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

Where this statement fits

Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.

Read the full case

Source and context

Reporting

Election 2026 - Candidate Question #8: Where do you stand on Flock cameras? (opens in a new tab)Candidate answers under the Council and Mayor headings of the article

About this source

Arizona Daily Sun feature in its 2026 candidate question series, printing the written answers of Flagstaff City Council and mayoral candidates to a question about Flock cameras. The paper says the answers were limited to 150 words and printed unedited unless a candidate went over that limit.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

The Arizona Daily Sun asked the Flagstaff City Council and mayoral candidates on the November ballot where they stood on Flock cameras and their potential use in Flagstaff. The paper printed their written answers, limited to 150 words and unedited unless a candidate exceeded that limit.

After the quotation

Baca's written answer consisted of this single paragraph. Other candidates' answers in the same article describe the council's December 2025 decision to cancel the Flock contract.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. Baca did not call for a ban or for bringing Flock back; she said the city must evaluate emerging technologies that can help first responders while being careful about how long data is kept and who can see it. That is openness to the technology subject to data limits, so Mixed or conditional fits.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Flock Safety

More from this case

Read the full case

Jacob Burnett says Flock-style cameras should be done away with, with warrants required if they stay

Jacob Burnett

“The systems themselves can be modified to prevent nearly all abuse and be made more secure by requiring warrants for access or follow through on any data the systems collect and have all data stored on the hardware itself preventing viewing from remote locations, requiring strict login credentials and a connecting warrant number to access. These are common sense changes that if the systems are to be used I feel could correct a lot of abuse or privacy concerns but I also feel the systems should be done away with overall, especially in the realm of predictive crime analytics.”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Nancy Baca, Baca says Flagstaff must balance new technology for first responders with privacy and data limitsDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Baca says Flagstaff must balance new technology for first responders with privacy and data limits
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/3141-nancy-baca-said-the-debate-over-flock-did

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Baca says Flagstaff must balance new technology for first responders with privacy and data limits". First published: 2026-09-29. Last updated: 2026-09-29. https://disputeindex.com/events/3141-nancy-baca-said-the-debate-over-flock-did