Ramaswamy warns of a surveillance state while opposing a Flock camera ban
Vivek RamaswamyRepublican nominee for Ohio governor
Ramaswamy said he does not want an authoritarian surveillance state and warned that government mapping of every movement could eventually lead to one, while saying the country is not there now.
“I do not want to see an authoritarian surveillance state that ultimately threatens what this country was built on, which was our freedom on the 250th anniversary of our Declaration of Independence. We remember that all men are created equal, endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights, among these life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and if the government is able to, and does, map out every movement you make, we're ultimately living, eventually, it's not there now, but eventually, you skate to where the puck is going, it's not hard to imagine a Chinese-style surveillance state”
Reporting
Where this statement fits
Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.
Source and context
Reporting
About this source
WKRC Local 12 report, syndicated on Dayton 24/7 Now, on how Ohio's candidates for governor and state officials view Flock cameras.
Before the quotation
WKRC reported that Democratic nominee Amy Acton had called on social media for a statewide ban on Flock cameras in Ohio.
After the quotation
WKRC reported that Ramaswamy disagrees with a ban but says Flock cameras should not be used in private spaces and that misuse of the system has to be taken seriously.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. Ramaswamy warns that government mapping of every movement could lead to a surveillance state, but says the country is not there now, and WKRC reports that he disagrees with a statewide ban while opposing use in private spaces. His concern is conditional and paired with rejection of a ban, so Mixed or conditional fits better than Condemned.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Flock Safety
More from this case
Read the full caseJacob Burnett says Flock-style cameras should be done away with, with warrants required if they stay
“The systems themselves can be modified to prevent nearly all abuse and be made more secure by requiring warrants for access or follow through on any data the systems collect and have all data stored on the hardware itself preventing viewing from remote locations, requiring strict login credentials and a connecting warrant number to access. These are common sense changes that if the systems are to be used I feel could correct a lot of abuse or privacy concerns but I also feel the systems should be done away with overall, especially in the realm of predictive crime analytics.”Read statement
Dean Brewer, an independent candidate for Tennessee governor, says Flock cameras should be banned
“I believe flock cameras should be banned.”Read statement
Buddy Carter says license plate cameras help investigators but need privacy safeguards
“Technologies like license plate recognition cameras can provide valuable investigative tools, but they have also raised important questions about privacy and government oversight. As these systems become more common, it is important to balance public safety with appropriate safeguards that protect individual privacy.”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Ramaswamy warns of a surveillance state while opposing a Flock camera ban
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/3106-ramaswamy-said-he-does-not-want-an-authoritarian
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Ramaswamy warns of a surveillance state while opposing a Flock camera ban". First published: 2026-09-29. Last updated: 2026-09-29. https://disputeindex.com/events/3106-ramaswamy-said-he-does-not-want-an-authoritarian