Noonan supports Flock cameras with access limits
Republican candidate for DuPage County sheriff
“At the end of the day, this is an investigative tool”
Source and context
Reporting
About this source
Original local reporting quotes both sheriff candidates on continued camera use and proposed controls.
Original video
About this source
Full recorded forum with Peter Coolidge and Sean Noonan, published by ElmhurstTV. The Flock statements are quoted in original local reporting.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Reporting
About this source
Pre-forum report gives the September 13 date and scheduled time for the sheriff candidate discussion.
Before the quotation
At a September 13 DuPage County sheriff candidate forum, Noonan was asked about Flock cameras as the county considered its next sheriff.
After the quotation
Noonan called for audits and said access should be limited to detectives and supervisors because of misuse concerns.
How this statement is classified
Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
He expressly supported the cameras' continued use. The proposed audits and access controls qualify implementation but do not reverse that endorsement.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Flock Safety
Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”Read statement
“Tennesseans should be free from a surveillance state.”Read statement
“We need to restore real limits, real oversight, and real due process.”Read statement