Yekutiel supports Flock cameras with privacy limits
San Francisco District 8 supervisor candidate
“Yes, I support it, with real guardrails.”
Source and context
Interview
About this source
Mission Local published direct responses from San Francisco District 8 supervisor candidates to whether they support the city's use of Flock cameras.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
Mission Local asked District 8 supervisor candidates whether they support San Francisco's use of Flock cameras.
After the quotation
Yekutiel said the city could use the cameras for public safety with limits on who accesses footage, how long it is kept and whether it reaches federal agencies.
How this statement is classified
Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. Yekutiel said he supports the cameras with real guardrails, including limits on access and retention and keeping data from federal agencies. Use with limits fits Mixed or conditional.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Flock Safety
Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”Read statement
“Tennesseans should be free from a surveillance state.”Read statement
“We need to restore real limits, real oversight, and real due process.”Read statement