Kissick opposes routine license-plate tracking
Libertarian nominee for Ohio governor
“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”
Source and context
Official statement
About this source
Kissick's campaign platform opposes routine tracking of drivers and says he would seek to restrict or prohibit government use of automated license-plate surveillance systems. It also proposes data limits and a bar on state funding for mass-surveillance networks.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
The campaign published a platform section addressing Flock cameras and routine tracking of drivers on public roads.
After the quotation
Kissick pledges to seek legislation restricting or prohibiting government use, limit vehicle-location data and block state funding for mass-surveillance networks.
How this statement is classified
Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
The platform rejects routine driver tracking and government-funded mass-surveillance networks. It leaves open whether the legislative result would restrict or prohibit all government ALPR use.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Flock Safety
Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“Tennesseans should be free from a surveillance state.”Read statement
“We need to restore real limits, real oversight, and real due process.”Read statement
“get them out of our county”Read statement