Benson calls for rules on Flock camera data

Michigan secretary of state and Democratic nominee for governor

“We can protect public safety and personal privacy when government is transparent about how it uses technology and is accountable for the power it has.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Jocelyn Benson on Flock camera privacy and proposed rulesStatement text under headline

Source and context

Official statement

Jocelyn Benson on Flock camera privacy and proposed rules (opens in a new tab)Statement text under headline

About this source

Benson's campaign statement discusses how Flock camera data is collected, accessed, shared and deleted. She calls for legislation to govern those practices while protecting public safety and privacy.

Before the quotation

Benson issued the statement amid concerns about the spread of Flock cameras and residents' uncertainty about access to their images.

After the quotation

She proposed legislation on use, access, sharing and deletion, and said government should be transparent and accountable.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

Her statement treats Flock cameras as a technology that may remain in use under new restrictions. That makes her position conditional on safeguards rather than an outright ban.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Flock Safety
A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

More from this case

Read the full case

Don Kissick

“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”
Read statement