Wagley faults unchecked Flock expansion
Republican candidate for U.S. House in Louisiana's 6th district
“For too long, these career politicians have been signing off on these deals, allocating funds to let things like Flock cameras basically just surveil us nonstop with no oversight.”
Source and context
Interview
About this source
Full radio interview includes Wagley's comments about officials funding Flock cameras without oversight.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Reporting
About this source
Original interview report quotes Wagley's comments about continuous Flock surveillance and the need for oversight.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
In a September 5 radio interview, Wagley discussed private deals involving data centers and surveillance cameras.
After the quotation
He argued that public officials had allowed the cameras to expand without oversight.
How this statement is classified
Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
Wagley objects to the current unchecked rollout but did not call for a categorical ban in the interview.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Flock Safety
Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”Read statement
“Tennesseans should be free from a surveillance state.”Read statement
“We need to restore real limits, real oversight, and real due process.”Read statement