Pinkston would keep ALPRs with strict limits

Lauren PinkstonIndependent candidate for Tennessee governor

Mixed or conditional

Pinkston supports limited ALPR use for investigations with short retention, verified matches, case-linked searches, and controlled interagency sharing.

“Tennesseans should be free from a surveillance state.”

Official statement

Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Lauren Pinkston for Tennessee, issues platformPublic Safety & Justice: Automatic License Plate Readers (ALPRs / Flock Cameras)

Case updates

Keep up with who wants to ban, limit or keep Flock cameras

Get an email if a candidate or official takes a new position on plate-reader networks, or if a city, legislature or court acts on them.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

Where this statement fits

Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.

Read the full case

Source and context

Official statement

Lauren Pinkston for Tennessee, issues platform (opens in a new tab)Public Safety & Justice: Automatic License Plate Readers (ALPRs / Flock Cameras)

About this source

Pinkston's campaign platform proposes a seven-day retention limit, human confirmation of matches, case-linked searches, and restrictions on outside agency access.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Pinkston's undated campaign issue page discusses Flock-style readers as an aid to investigations.

After the quotation

It calls for deletion after seven days, human confirmation of matches, a case ID for searches, and formal requests from outside agencies.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Pinkston would permit investigative use under conditions, rather than eliminate the systems.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Flock Safety

More from this case

Read the full case

Jacob Burnett says Flock-style cameras should be done away with, with warrants required if they stay

Jacob Burnett

“The systems themselves can be modified to prevent nearly all abuse and be made more secure by requiring warrants for access or follow through on any data the systems collect and have all data stored on the hardware itself preventing viewing from remote locations, requiring strict login credentials and a connecting warrant number to access. These are common sense changes that if the systems are to be used I feel could correct a lot of abuse or privacy concerns but I also feel the systems should be done away with overall, especially in the realm of predictive crime analytics.”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Lauren Pinkston, Pinkston would keep ALPRs with strict limitsDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Pinkston would keep ALPRs with strict limits
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/3069-pinkston-supports-limited-alpr-use-for-investigations-with

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Pinkston would keep ALPRs with strict limits". First published: 2026-09-29. Last updated: 2026-09-29. https://disputeindex.com/events/3069-pinkston-supports-limited-alpr-use-for-investigations-with