Mary Frances Clardy opposes Flock cameras in Minnesota
Minnesota state representative and 2026 candidate for District 53A
“I am opposed to the use of Flock cameras in Minnesota.”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)Minnesota House District 53A candidate questionnaire on Flock camerasTransparency question and candidate answers
Source and context
Interview
Minnesota House District 53A candidate questionnaire on Flock cameras (opens in a new tab)Transparency question and candidate answers
About this source
Candidate questionnaire prints direct answers from Mary Frances Clardy and AJ Gubash about continued Flock camera use in Minnesota.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
The candidate questionnaire asked whether Flock cameras should continue to be used in Minnesota.
After the quotation
Clardy cited West St. Paul's rejection of the cameras and concerns about federal access to data.
How this statement is classified
Condemned
Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
She expressly opposes continued Flock camera use in her state.
- Recorded on
- Published here
Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”Read statement
“Tennesseans should be free from a surveillance state.”Read statement
“We need to restore real limits, real oversight, and real due process.”Read statement