Mary Frances Clardy opposes Flock cameras in Minnesota

Mary Frances ClardyMinnesota state representative and 2026 candidate for District 53A

Condemned

Clardy said she opposes Flock cameras in Minnesota and pointed to the risk that government agencies could gain access to residents' location data.

“I am opposed to the use of Flock cameras in Minnesota.”

Interview

Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)Minnesota House District 53A candidate questionnaire on Flock camerasTransparency question and candidate answers

Case updates

Keep up with who wants to ban, limit or keep Flock cameras

Get an email if a candidate or official takes a new position on plate-reader networks, or if a city, legislature or court acts on them.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

Where this statement fits

Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.

Read the full case

Source and context

Interview

Minnesota House District 53A candidate questionnaire on Flock cameras (opens in a new tab)Transparency question and candidate answers

About this source

Candidate questionnaire prints direct answers from Mary Frances Clardy and AJ Gubash about continued Flock camera use in Minnesota.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

The candidate questionnaire asked whether Flock cameras should continue to be used in Minnesota.

After the quotation

Clardy cited West St. Paul's rejection of the cameras and concerns about federal access to data.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

She expressly opposes continued Flock camera use in her state.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Jacob Burnett says Flock-style cameras should be done away with, with warrants required if they stay

Jacob Burnett

“The systems themselves can be modified to prevent nearly all abuse and be made more secure by requiring warrants for access or follow through on any data the systems collect and have all data stored on the hardware itself preventing viewing from remote locations, requiring strict login credentials and a connecting warrant number to access. These are common sense changes that if the systems are to be used I feel could correct a lot of abuse or privacy concerns but I also feel the systems should be done away with overall, especially in the realm of predictive crime analytics.”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Mary Frances Clardy, Mary Frances Clardy opposes Flock cameras in MinnesotaDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Mary Frances Clardy opposes Flock cameras in Minnesota
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/3054-clardy-said-she-opposes-flock-cameras-in-minnesota

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Mary Frances Clardy opposes Flock cameras in Minnesota". First published: 2026-09-29. Last updated: 2026-09-29. https://disputeindex.com/events/3054-clardy-said-she-opposes-flock-cameras-in-minnesota